HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Policy Disparities in Response to COVID-19 between China and South Korea.

AbstractOBJECTIVES:
This study analyzed the effects of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical measures between China and South Korea to share experiences with other countries in the struggle against SARS-CoV-2.
METHODS:
We used the generalized linear model to examine the associations between non-pharmaceutical measures adopted by China and South Korea and the number of confirmed cases. Policy disparities were also discussed between these two countries.
RESULTS:
The results show that the following factors influence the number of confirmed cases in China: lockdown of Wuhan city (LWC); establishment of a Leading Group by the Central Government; raising the public health emergency response to the highest level in all localities; classifying management of "four categories of personnel"; makeshift hospitals in operation (MHIO); pairing assistance (PA); launching massive community screening (LMCS). In South Korea, these following factors were the key influencing factors of the cumulative confirmed cases: raising the public alert level to orange (three out of four levels); raising the public alert to the highest level; launching drive-through screening centers (LDSC); screening all members of Shincheonji religious group; launching Community Treatment Center (LCTC); distributing public face masks nationwide and quarantining all travelers from overseas countries for 14 days.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the analysis of the generalized linear model, we found that a series of non-pharmaceutical measures were associated with contain of the COVID-19 outbreak in China and South Korea. The following measures were crucial for both of them to fight against the COVID-19 epidemic: a strong national response system, expanding diagnostic tests, establishing makeshift hospitals, and quarantine or lockdown affected areas.
AuthorsHaiqian Chen, Leiyu Shi, Yuyao Zhang, Xiaohan Wang, Gang Sun
JournalJournal of epidemiology and global health (J Epidemiol Glob Health) Vol. 11 Issue 2 Pg. 246-252 (Jun 2021) ISSN: 2210-6014 [Electronic] Switzerland
PMID33876595 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Copyright© 2021 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press International B.V.
Topics
  • COVID-19 (epidemiology, prevention & control)
  • China (epidemiology)
  • Communicable Disease Control (legislation & jurisprudence)
  • Health Policy (legislation & jurisprudence)
  • Humans
  • Republic of Korea (epidemiology)
  • SARS-CoV-2

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: