Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting abstracts, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to July 2020 to identify any randomized controlled trials related to immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of mRCC. The primary outcome was progressionfree survival, and the secondary outcomes were overall survival and grade 3-4 adverse events. RESULTS: The network meta-analysis included 4,049 patients from 5 randomized controlled trials. Avelumab plus axitinib and pembrolizumab plus axitinib were the best treatment options in terms of progression-free survival. For overall survival, pembrolizumab plus axitinib had a 77.89% probability of being the preferred treatment. For adverse events, there was an 89.21% probability that pembrolizumab plus axitinib was the regimen with the worst side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Through a meta-analysis of the latest available first-line immunotherapy progression-free survival and overall survival data for mRCC, this study found that pembrolizumab plus axitinib might be the best immunotherapy option for first-line treatment. However, attention should be paid to the potential adverse events of this regimen.
|
Authors | Zheran Liu, Ye Chen, Zhigong Wei, Yan He, Jingjing Wang, Xiaoli Mu, Ling He, Ruidan Li, Xiaolin Hu, Xingchen Peng |
Journal | Annals of palliative medicine
(Ann Palliat Med)
Vol. 10
Issue 3
Pg. 2805-2814
(Mar 2021)
ISSN: 2224-5839 [Electronic] China |
PMID | 33615806
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review)
|
Topics |
- Bayes Theorem
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
(drug therapy)
- Humans
- Immunotherapy
- Kidney Neoplasms
(drug therapy)
- Network Meta-Analysis
|