HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Predicting Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis: Performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and Development of a New Prognostic Model.

Abstract
Accurate prognostic tools are crucial to assess the risk/benefit ratio of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and identify risk factors for survival in a multicenter series of 197 patients with MF undergoing allo-HCT. After a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 47% of patients had died, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 51%. Projected 5-year risk of nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence was 30% and 20%, respectively. Factors independently associated with increased mortality were a hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥3 and receiving a graft from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor or cord blood, whereas post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) was associated with improved survival. Donor type was the only parameter included in the MTSS model with independent prognostic value for survival. According to the MTSS, 3-year survival was 62%, 66%, 37%, and 17% for low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups, respectively. By pooling together the low- and intermediate-risk groups, as well as the high- and very high-risk groups, we pinpointed 2 categories: standard risk and high risk (25% of the series). Three-year survival was 62% in standard-risk and 25% in high-risk categories (P < .001). We derived a risk score based on the 3 independent risk factors for survival in our series (donor type, HCT-CI, and PT-Cy). The corresponding 5-year survival for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories was 79%, 55%, and 32%, respectively (P < .001). In conclusion, the MTSS model failed to clearly delineate 4 prognostic groups in our series but may still be useful to identify a subset of patients with poor outcome. We provide a simple prognostic scoring system for risk/benefit considerations before transplantation in patients with MF.
AuthorsJuan-Carlos Hernández-Boluda, Arturo Pereira, Alberto Alvarez-Larran, Ana-Africa Martín, Ana Benzaquen, Lourdes Aguirre, Elvira Mora, Pedro González, Jorge Mora, Nieves Dorado, Antonia Sampol, Valentín García-Gutiérrez, Oriana López-Godino, María-Laura Fox, Juan Luis Reguera, Manuel Pérez-Encinas, María-Jesús Pascual, Blanca Xicoy, Rocío Parody, Leslie González-Pinedo, Ignacio Español, Alejandro Avendaño, Juan-Gonzalo Correa, Carlos Vallejo, Manuel Jurado, Irene García-Cadenas, Santiago Osorio, María-Antonia Durán, Fermín Sánchez-Guijo, Francisco Cervantes, José-Luis Piñana
JournalBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (Biol Blood Marrow Transplant) Vol. 26 Issue 12 Pg. 2237-2244 (12 2020) ISSN: 1523-6536 [Electronic] United States
PMID32717433 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study)
CopyrightCopyright © 2020 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Humans
  • Primary Myelofibrosis (therapy)
  • Prognosis
  • Transplantation Conditioning
  • Transplantation, Homologous
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: