HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Quantitative flow ratio-guided strategy versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the FAVOR III China trial.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel angiography-based approach enabling fast computation of fractional flow reserve without use of pressure wire or adenosine. The objective of this investigator-initiated, multicenter, patient- and clinical assessor-blinded randomized trial is to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a QFR-augmented angiography-guided (QFR-guided) strategy versus an angiography-only guided (angiography-guided) strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease.
METHODS:
Approximately 3,830 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a QFR-guided or an angiography-guided strategy. Included subjects scheduled for coronary angiography have at least 1 lesion eligible for PCI with 50%-90% stenosis in an artery with ≥2.5 mm reference diameter. Subjects assigned to the QFR-guided strategy will have QFR measured in each interrogated vessel and undergo PCI when QFR ≤0.80, with deferral for lesions with QFR >0.80. Those assigned to the angiography-guided strategy will undergo PCI based on angiography. Optimal medical therapy will be administered to all treated and deferred patients. The primary end point is the 1-year rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, or any ischemia-driven revascularization. The major secondary end point is 1-year MACE excluding periprocedural myocardial infarction. Other secondary end points include the individual components of MACE and cost-effectiveness end points. The sample size affords 85% power to demonstrate superiority of QFR guidance compared with angiography guidance.
CONCLUSIONS:
The FAVOR III China study will be the first randomized trial to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a QFR-guided versus an angiography-guided PCI strategy in coronary artery disease patients.
AuthorsLei Song, Shengxian Tu, Zhongwei Sun, Yang Wang, Daixin Ding, Changdong Guan, Lihua Xie, Javier Escaned, William F Fearon, Ajay J Kirtane, Patrick W Serruys, William Wijns, Stephan Windecker, Martin B Leon, Gregg W Stone, Shubin Qiao, Bo Xu, FAVOR III China Investigators
JournalAmerican heart journal (Am Heart J) Vol. 223 Pg. 72-80 (05 2020) ISSN: 1097-6744 [Electronic] United States
PMID32179258 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial Protocol, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Coronary Artery Disease (diagnostic imaging, physiopathology, surgery)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
  • Humans
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic (methods)
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (methods)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic (methods)
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: