Abstract |
Background: Stroke is a major cause of life-long disability in adults, associated with poor quality of life. Virtual reality (VR)-based therapy systems are known to be helpful in improving motor functions following stroke, but recent clinical findings have not been included in the previous publications of meta-analysis studies.Aims: This meta-analysis was based on the available literature to evaluate the therapeutic potential of VR as compared to dose-matched conventional therapies (CT) in patients with stroke.Methods: We retrieved relevant articles in EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science published between 2010 and February 2019. Peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials that compared VR with CT were included.Results: A total of 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis indicated that the VR group showed statistically significant improvement in the recovery of UL function (Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity [FM-UE]: n = 20 studies, Mean Difference [MD] = 3.84, P = .01), activity (Box and Block Test [BBT]: n = 13, MD = 3.82, P = .04), and participation (Motor Activity Log [MAL]: n = 6, MD = 0.8, P = .0001) versus the control group.Conclusion: VR appears to be a promising therapeutic technology for UL motor rehabilitation in patients with stroke.
|
Authors | Destaw B Mekbib, Jiawei Han, Li Zhang, Shan Fang, Hongjie Jiang, Junming Zhu, Anna W Roe, Dongrong Xu |
Journal | Brain injury
(Brain Inj)
Vol. 34
Issue 4
Pg. 456-465
(03 20 2020)
ISSN: 1362-301X [Electronic] England |
PMID | 32064964
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Humans
- Quality of Life
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Recovery of Function
- Stroke
(therapy)
- Stroke Rehabilitation
- Upper Extremity
- Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy
|