Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in complex cases of left lateral sectionectomy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic liver resection is recommended as the standard operation for left lateral sectionectomy (LLS). Robotic liver resection is theoretically better than laparoscopic liver resection in complex cases of liver resection. However, in a complex case of LLS, whether robotic LLS (R-LLS) is still better than laparoscopic LLS (L-LLS) is unclear. This study aims to assess the perioperative outcomes of R-LLS and L-LLS in the overall and in the subgroup of complex cases of LLS.

METHODS:

From January 2015 to June 2017, the data on consecutive patients who underwent R-LLS were retrospectively compared with those who underwent L-LLS. Based on defined criteria for complex cases, the subgroup of such patients who underwent R-LLS were compared with the subgroup of patients who underwent L-LLS. The patient characteristics and surgical outcomes in the whole groups and subgroups of patients were analyzed.

RESULTS:

The overall R-LLS and L-LLS groups showed no significance differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, blood transfusion and morbidity rates. The overall medical costs were significantly higher in the R-LLS group than in the L-LLS group (12786.4 vs. 7974.3 USD; p < 0.001). On subgroup analysis of the complex cases, the estimated blood loss was significantly less in the R-LLS subgroup than the L-LLS subgroup (131.9 vs. 320.8 ml, p = 0.003). The two subgroups showed no significant differences in postoperative hospital stay (4.7 vs. 5.3 days; p = 0.054) and operative times (126.4 vs. 110.8 min; p = 0.379). The R-LLS subgroup had significantly higher overall medical costs than the L-LLS subgroup (13536.9 vs. 9186.7 USD, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION:

The overall R-LLS group was comparable to the overall L-LLS group in perioperative outcomes. Although the overall medical costs in the robotic subgroup was higher, R-LLS might be a better choice for the subgroup of patients with complex cases when compared to L-LLS.

• Authors: Minggen Hu, Yanzhe Liu, Chenggang Li, Gang Wang, Zhuzeng Yin, Wan Yee Lau, Rong Liu
• Journal: International journal of surgery (London, England) (Int J Surg) Vol. 67 Pg. 54-60 (Jul 2019) ISSN: 1743-9159 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 31121328 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
• Copyright: Copyright © 2019 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Topics

• Adult
• Blood Loss, Surgical
• Blood Transfusion (statistics & numerical data)
• Female
• Health Care Costs
• Hepatectomy (adverse effects, economics, methods)
• Humans
• Laparoscopy (adverse effects, economics, methods)
• Length of Stay (economics)
• Liver (surgery)
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Operative Time
• Postoperative Complications (economics, etiology)
• Retrospective Studies
• Robotic Surgical Procedures (adverse effects, economics, methods)
• Treatment Outcome