Abstract | OBJECTIVE: Ultrasonically activated shears (UAS) have been applied in open gastric surgeries with no or little evidence. It was previously reported about the surgical outcome and effectiveness of UAS based on a randomized controlled trial of 256 patients with gastric cancer. We aimed to clarify the long-term oncological safety of the use of UAS in the aspect of overall survival and recurrence. METHODS:
Gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the conventional surgery group (n=125) or the UAS group (n=128). Survival, recurrence and long-term postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The median follow-up period was 56 months. RESULTS:
Gastric cancer-related death was higher in patients of the UAS group compared with the conventional group (P=0.019). Overall survival rates stratified by stage were not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.170). Disease-free survival rates stratified by stage and recurrence-free survival rates of gastric cancer were similar between the conventional group and the UAS group (P=0.313 and 0.199, respectively). The postoperative complication rate was not significantly different between the groups (P=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the use of UAS in gastrectomy for gastric cancer showed oncologically acceptable safety compared with conventional electric instruments even in long-term period.
|
Authors | Su Mi Kim, Jae-Moon Bae, Min-Gew Choi, Jun Ho Lee, Tae Sung Sohn, Sung Kim |
Journal | Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu
(Chin J Cancer Res)
Vol. 30
Issue 5
Pg. 492-499
(Oct 2018)
ISSN: 1000-9604 [Print] China |
PMID | 30510360
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|