HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Health care disparities among octogenarians and nonagenarians with stage II and III rectal cancer.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Octogenarians and nonagenarians with stage II/III rectal adenocarcinomas are underrepresented in the randomized trials that have established the standard-of-care therapy of preoperative chemoradiation followed by definitive resection (ie, chemoradiation and then surgery [CRT+S]). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of therapies on overall survival (OS) for patients with stage II/III rectal cancers and determine predictors of therapy within the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).
METHODS:
In the NCDB, patients who were 80 years old or older and had clinical stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2013 were queried. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank testing, logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, interaction effect testing, and propensity score-matched analysis were conducted.
RESULTS:
The criteria were met by 2723 patients: 14.9% received no treatment, 29.7% had surgery alone, 5.0% underwent short-course radiation and then surgery (RT+S), 45.3% underwent CRT+S, and 5.1% underwent surgery and then chemoradiation (S+CRT). African American race and residence in a less educated county were associated with not receiving treatment. Male sex, older age, worsening comorbidities, and receiving no treatment or undergoing surgery alone were associated with worse OS. There was no statistical difference in OS between RT+S, S+CRT, and CRT+S. Interaction testing found that CRT+S improved OS independently of age, comorbidity status, sex, race, and tumor stage. In the propensity score-matched analysis, CRT+S was associated with improved OS in comparison with surgery alone.
CONCLUSIONS:
A significant portion of octogenarians and nonagenarians with stage II/III rectal adenocarcinomas do not receive treatment. African American race and living in a less educated community are associated with not receiving therapy. This series suggests that CRT+S is a reasonable strategy for elderly patients who can tolerate therapy. Cancer 2017;123:4325-36. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
AuthorsRichard J Cassidy, Jeffrey M Switchenko, En Cheng, Renjian Jiang, Jaymin Jhaveri, Kirtesh R Patel, Daniel G Tanenbaum, Maria C Russell, Conor E Steuer, Theresa W Gillespie, Mark W McDonald, Jerome C Landry
JournalCancer (Cancer) Vol. 123 Issue 22 Pg. 4325-4336 (Nov 15 2017) ISSN: 1097-0142 [Electronic] United States
PMID28759121 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Copyright© 2017 American Cancer Society.
Topics
  • Adenocarcinoma (epidemiology, pathology)
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (therapeutic use)
  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Comorbidity
  • Databases, Factual
  • Female
  • Healthcare Disparities (statistics & numerical data)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Rectal Neoplasms (epidemiology, pathology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: