Emphysematous pyelonephritis: Is nephrectomy warranted?

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is associated with high mortality rate, up to 25%. There is still conflicting reports regarding the most appropriate management, conservative versus nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE:

To describe the outcome of patients with EPN.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with EPN by computed tomography from three tertiary institutes in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Type of management was classified as conservative and surgical. The conservative includes medical and minimally invasive procedures, such as percutaneous drainage and nephrostomy. The surgical which is nephrectomy. The outcome observed was preservation of the kidney function or patient's life.

RESULTS:

A total of 10 patients were included (9 females and 1 male), median age was 55 years and 63% were diabetic. The most common presentation was flank pain (100%), fever (75%), and vomiting (63%). The most common organism isolated was Escherichia coli. Nephrectomy was not associated with increased survival rate, while conservative management was associated with a good outcome, less morbidity (not dialysis-dependent).

CONCLUSION:

Nephrectomy was not associated with high survival rate. Patients managed conservatively had a better overall performance and better survival. This study will add to other studies, which are encouraging conservative management.

• Authors: Mada Alsharif, Abdullah Mohammedkhalil, Basim Alsaywid, Ali Alhazmy, Salahadin Lamy
• Journal: Urology annals (Urol Ann) 2015 Oct-Dec Vol. 7 Issue 4 Pg. 494-8 ISSN: 0974-7796 [Print] India
• PMID: 26692672 (Publication Type: Journal Article)