HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Prognostic benefit of transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with medical therapy in patients with inoperable aortic stenosis.

AbstractOBJECTIVES:
To compare survival in patients with inoperable aortic stenosis who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation against those managed medically.
BACKGROUND:
Without surgical correction, survival of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis is poor. It is unknown whether patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have a better prognosis than similar patients who are treated with medical management.
METHODS:
Survival rates were compared in consecutive patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who either underwent TAVI or continued on medical management following multidisciplinary team assessment. All patients had been turned down, or considered at unacceptably high risk, for conventional aortic valve surgery. Patients were reviewed in clinic or by telephone six monthly. Mortality data was obtained from the United Kingdom Office of National Statistics.
RESULTS:
The study group included 85 patients aged 81 +/- 7 years (range 62-94), of whom 48 were male. Thirty eight patients underwent TAVI while 47 patients were deemed unsuitable based on echocardiographic, angiographic, or clinical criteria and remained on medical therapy. The calculated EuroSCORE for the TAVI group was 11 +/- 2 and for the medical group 9 +/- 2 (P < 0.001). TAVI-related procedural mortality was 2.6%, and 30-day mortality was 5.2%. Among the medically-treated patients, 14 (30%) underwent palliative balloon aortic valvuloplasty, with a trend toward improved survival (P = 0.06). During overall follow-up of 215 +/- 115 days there were a total of 18 deaths; TAVI N = 5 (13%); Medical N = 13 (28%) (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS:
Patients with severe aortic valve disease who are not suitable for surgical aortic valve replacement have an improved prognosis if treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation rather than continuing on medical management alone.
AuthorsRonak Rajani, William Buxton, Peter Haworth, Muhammed Z Khawaja, Manav Sohal, Roberta L Brum, Nevil Hutchinson, Adam de Belder, Uday Trivedi, David Hildick-Smith
JournalCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (Catheter Cardiovasc Interv) Vol. 75 Issue 7 Pg. 1121-6 (Jun 01 2010) ISSN: 1522-726X [Electronic] United States
PMID20146205 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Cardiovascular Agents
Topics
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis (diagnosis, drug therapy, mortality, therapy)
  • Cardiac Catheterization (mortality)
  • Cardiovascular Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Catheterization (mortality)
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Female
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation (methods, mortality)
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United Kingdom

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: