HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Phase III study of gemcitabine plus docetaxel compared with capecitabine plus docetaxel for anthracycline-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

AbstractPURPOSE:
Patients with metastatic breast cancer who are pretreated with anthracyclines frequently receive taxane-based combinations. This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-docetaxel (GD) with capecitabine-docetaxel (CD) in advanced breast cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Patients were randomly assigned to GD (G 1,000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; D 75 mg/m(2) day 1) or CD (C 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily days 1 through 14; D 75 mg/m(2) day 1) every 21 days. Comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary objective.
RESULTS:
Patient characteristics were balanced between arms (N = 305). Median PFS was 8.05 months (95% CI, 6.60 to 8.71) for GD and 7.98 (95% CI, 6.93 to 8.77) for CD (log-rank P = .121). Overall response rate (ORR) was 32% in both arms, and overall survival (OS) was not different between arms (P = .983). Time to treatment failure (TTF; defined as discontinuation, progressive disease, death as a result of any cause, or the start of a new anticancer therapy) was superior in the GD arm (P = .059). Hematologic toxicity was similar in both arms, except for grades 3 to 4 leukopenia (GD, 78%; CD, 66%; P = .025) and transfusions (GD, 17%; CD, 7%; P = .0051). Grades 3 to 4 diarrhea, mucositis, and hand-and-foot syndrome were significantly higher in the CD arm. Fewer patients in the GD arm discontinued because of drug-related adverse events (13% v 27% in CD; P = .002).
CONCLUSION:
No difference was observed between GD and CD arms in PFS, ORR, and OS. TTF was longer in the GD arm. These findings, combined with a nonhematologic toxicity profile that favors GD over approved doses of CD, suggest that gemcitabine may be a better option than capecitabine in combination with docetaxel in this clinical setting.
AuthorsStephen Chan, Gilles Romieu, Jens Huober, Thierry Delozier, Michele Tubiana-Hulin, Andreas Schneeweiss, Ana Lluch, Antonio Llombart, Andreas du Bois, Rolf Kreienberg, Jose Ignacio Mayordomo, Antonio Antón, Mark Harrison, Alison Jones, Eva Carrasco, A Thareau Vaury, Bente Frimodt-Moller, Pierre Fumoleau
JournalJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (J Clin Oncol) Vol. 27 Issue 11 Pg. 1753-60 (Apr 10 2009) ISSN: 1527-7755 [Electronic] United States
PMID19273714 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Anthracyclines
  • Taxoids
  • Deoxycytidine
  • Docetaxel
  • Capecitabine
  • Fluorouracil
  • Gemcitabine
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anthracyclines (administration & dosage)
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (administration & dosage)
  • Breast Neoplasms (drug therapy, secondary)
  • Capecitabine
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Deoxycytidine (administration & dosage, analogs & derivatives)
  • Docetaxel
  • Female
  • Fluorouracil (administration & dosage, analogs & derivatives)
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Survival Analysis
  • Taxoids (administration & dosage)
  • Gemcitabine

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: