HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Outcome is not improved by the use of alternating chemotherapy in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma.

AbstractINTRODUCTION:
A prospective randomised study involving 810 elderly patients was conducted in an attempt to compare alternating chemotherapy with conventional first-line chemotherapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in order to improve prognosis with an acceptable toxicity for elderly patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Patients included were 55-69 years old and had at least one adverse prognostic factor. Patients were treated either with ACVBP followed by consolidation (n = 396) or with an alternating regimen (n = 414). This regimen was an association of active drugs in NHL relapsing patients, alternating VIMMM with ACVBP for induction and alternation of VIM and ACVM in consolidation. Eight hundred and sixty-six patients were randomised. After histological review, 810 patients met the inclusion criteria: 396 in arm A, 414 in arm B.
RESULTS:
The complete response rate after induction was superior for conventional first-line therapy (58.5% vs 48%, P = 0.003) but at the end of treatment, the CR rate was not statistically different (52% vs 48%, P = 0.19). Conventional chemotherapy had a better five-year event-free survival than alternating regimen (33% (95% CI: 30-36%) vs 28% (95% CI: 26-30%), P = 0.0289) but overall survival was not statistically different (40% (CI 95% 38-42%) vs 36% (CI 95% 34-38%), P = 0.068). In this elderly high risk population, the toxicity was very high: 19% in arm A and 26% in arm B died during treatment.
CONCLUSION:
Alternating regimen did not improve outcome, was less efficient and more toxic.
AuthorsA Bosly, E Lepage, B Coiffier, G Fillet, R Herbrecht, M Divine, B Dupriez, C Nouvel, E Deconninck, H Tilly, D Bordessoule, P Gaulard, C Gisselbrecht, GELA
JournalThe hematology journal : the official journal of the European Haematology Association (Hematol J) Vol. 2 Issue 4 Pg. 279-85 ( 2001) ISSN: 1466-4860 [Print] England
PMID11920261 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Bleomycin
  • Etoposide
  • Doxorubicin
  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Mitoxantrone
  • Vindesine
  • Ifosfamide
  • Prednisone
  • Methotrexate
Topics
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (administration & dosage, therapeutic use, toxicity)
  • Bleomycin (administration & dosage)
  • Cyclophosphamide (administration & dosage)
  • Doxorubicin (administration & dosage)
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Etoposide (administration & dosage)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Ifosfamide (administration & dosage)
  • Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin (complications, drug therapy, mortality)
  • Male
  • Methotrexate (administration & dosage)
  • Middle Aged
  • Mitoxantrone (administration & dosage)
  • Prednisone (administration & dosage)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Remission Induction
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vindesine (administration & dosage)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: