This study examines which of three
splint designs most effectively improved hand function in a patient with
radial nerve palsy, and demonstrates the application of a single-subject experimental design. The static volar wrist cock-up
splint (
splint 1), dynamic
tenodesis suspension splint (
splint 2), and dorsal wrist cock-up with dynamic finger extension
splint (
splint 3) were evaluated. Each
splint was worn for 3 weeks, and hand function was assessed by means of standardized measures of function and disability. Statistical significance was calculated using the minimal level of detectable change (MDC) at the 95% confidence level. Only with
splints 2 and 3 did a true change in function occur, compared with baseline scores (no
splint). In addition, the patient completed all tasks while using
splints 2 and 3 but did not complete three tasks while using
splint 1. The hand therapists' goal is to fabricate a
splint that improves function and that the patient will wear. Only
splint 3 met these criteria. This experiment highlights the need to evaluate both the statistical and the clinical significance of treatment interventions.