HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Role of Targeted Therapies in Management of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy.

AbstractOPINION STATEMENT:
Despite significant advances and the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors, metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is still very hard to treat and has poor outcomes. Deeper understanding of the molecular underpinnings of mUC has identified potential biomarkers, biologic drivers, and relevant therapy targets. However, targeted therapies in mUC have had significant challenges due to molecular heterogeneity, clonal evolution, and genomic instability, and have not improved outcomes so far. Despite that, recent technological developments, clinical utilization of molecular biology, and discovery of new agents with preclinical and early clinical activity have signaled a new age of experimental therapeutics in mUC. The more frequent use of next-generation sequencing of tumor tissue and cell-free circulating tumor DNA, combined with novel agents tested in clinical trials, provides promise. There is a plethora of agents being tested in mUC, including inhibitors of receptors and signaling pathways (e.g., fibroblast growth factor receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT/mTOR pathway), angiogenesis (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors), poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, immuno-oncology agents, cytotoxic agents (e.g., chemotherapy, antibody drug conjugates), and epigenetic modulators, among others. Two agents, enfortumab-vedotin (antibody drug conjugate) and erdafitinib (fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor), have breakthrough designation by the FDA, but are not approved as of March 2019. Novel combinations with various modalities and optimal sequencing of active therapies are being investigated in clinical trials. More sophisticated patient selection, discovery and prospective validation of predictive (and prognostic) biomarkers with clinical utility, and relevant clinical trial designs are important parameters in that context. Based on the above, there is high potential for targeted therapies to be added in the growing armamentarium of mUC, and possibly complement chemotherapy and immuno-oncology agents.
AuthorsPetros Grivas, Evan Y Yu
JournalCurrent treatment options in oncology (Curr Treat Options Oncol) Vol. 20 Issue 8 Pg. 67 (06 28 2019) ISSN: 1534-6277 [Electronic] United States
PMID31254108 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)
Chemical References
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Immunoconjugates
Topics
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Disease Management
  • Disease Susceptibility
  • Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic (drug effects)
  • Humans
  • Immunoconjugates (pharmacology, therapeutic use)
  • Immunotherapy
  • Molecular Targeted Therapy
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Signal Transduction (drug effects)
  • Urologic Neoplasms (etiology, metabolism, pathology, therapy)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: