Paclitaxel has been shown to have clinical activity in the treatment of
small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, its role as third-line
chemotherapy for SCLC after both
etoposide- and
camptothecin-based regimens has not been clarified.All patients with refractory SCLC who were treated with
paclitaxel-based regimen as third-line
chemotherapy between 2005 and 2011 in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Forty patients previously treated with both
etoposide- and
camptothecin-based
chemotherapy were included.The median age of the enrolled patients was 67 years (range, 35-86 years). Most patients (77.5%) received
cisplatin plus
etoposide as first-line
therapy, and camptothecins such as
irinotecan or
topotecan as second-line
therapy. Of 34 patients with measurable lesions, 8 patients (23.5%) achieved partial response and 9 (26.5%) had stable disease. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.5 and 5.9 months, respectively. Predictive factors for OS were performance status (PS) (PS <2 vs ≥2; P = .001), the presence of liver
metastasis (P < .001), and number of metastatic sites (<3 vs ≥3; P = .047) in univariate analysis. PS and liver
metastasis also remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was 20% for
neutropenia, and 10% for
thrombocytopenia. Other common non-hematological toxicities were
peripheral neuropathy and mild liver
enzyme elevation.Paclitaxel-based
chemotherapy showed modest activity in SCLC patients refractory to both
etoposide- and
camptothecin-based
chemotherapy. PS and presence of liver
metastasis were predictive of survival after
paclitaxel chemotherapy.