HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Therapies for Macular Edema Associated with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

AbstractPURPOSE:
To evaluate the available evidence on the ocular safety and efficacy of current therapeutic alternatives for the management of macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).
METHODS:
Literature searches were last conducted on January 31, 2017, in PubMed with no date restrictions and limited to articles published in English, and in the Cochrane Database without language limitations. The searches yielded 321 citations, of which 109 were reviewed in full text and 27 were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this assessment. The panel methodologist assigned ratings to the selected studies according to the level of evidence.
RESULTS:
Level I evidence was identified in 10 articles that addressed anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pharmacotherapies for ME, including intravitreal bevacizumab (5), aflibercept (2), and ranibizumab (4). Level I evidence was identified in 6 studies that examined intravitreal corticosteroids, including triamcinolone (4) and the dexamethasone implant (2). Level I evidence also was available for the role of macular grid laser photocoagulation (7) and scatter peripheral laser surgery (1). The inclusion of level II and level III studies was limited given the preponderance of level I studies. The number of studies on combination therapy is limited.
CONCLUSIONS:
Current level I evidence suggests that intravitreal pharmacotherapy with anti-VEGF agents is effective and safe for ME secondary to BRVO. Prolonged delay in treatment is associated with less improvement in visual acuity (VA). Level I evidence also indicates that intravitreal corticosteroids are effective and safe for the management of ME associated with BRVO; however, corticosteroids are associated with increased potential ocular side effects (e.g., elevated intraocular pressure, cataracts). Laser photocoagulation remains a safe and effective therapy, but VA results lag behind the results for anti-VEGF therapies.
AuthorsJustis P Ehlers, Stephen J Kim, Steven Yeh, Jennifer E Thorne, Prithvi Mruthyunjaya, Scott D Schoenberger, Sophie J Bakri
JournalOphthalmology (Ophthalmology) Vol. 124 Issue 9 Pg. 1412-1423 (09 2017) ISSN: 1549-4713 [Electronic] United States
PMID28551163 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
CopyrightCopyright © 2017 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors
  • Drug Implants
  • Dexamethasone
Topics
  • Academies and Institutes
  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors (therapeutic use)
  • Databases, Factual
  • Dexamethasone (therapeutic use)
  • Drug Implants
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Humans
  • Intravitreal Injections
  • Macular Edema (drug therapy, etiology, physiopathology)
  • Ophthalmology (organization & administration)
  • Retinal Vein Occlusion (complications, drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Technology Assessment, Biomedical
  • United States
  • Visual Acuity

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: