A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camostat mesilate in patients with COVID-19 (CANDLE study).

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In vitro drug screening studies have indicated that camostat mesilate (FOY-305) may prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection into human airway epithelial cells. This study was conducted to investigate whether camostat mesilate is an effective treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19).

METHODS:

This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. Patients were enrolled if they were admitted to a hospital within 5 days of onset of COVID-19 symptoms or within 5 days of a positive test for asymptomatic patients. Severe cases (e.g., those requiring oxygenation/ventilation) were excluded. Patients were enrolled, randomized, and allocated to each group using an interactive web response system. Randomization was performed using a minimization method with the factors medical institution, age, and underlying diseases (chronic respiratory disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and obesity). The patients, investigators/subinvestigators, study coordinators, and other study personnel were blinded throughout the study. Patients were administered camostat mesilate (600 mg qid; four to eight times higher than the clinical doses in Japan) or placebo for up to 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to the first two consecutive negative tests for SARS-CoV-2.

RESULTS:

One-hundred fifty-five patients were randomized to receive camostat mesilate (n = 78) or placebo (n = 77). The median time to the first test was 11.0 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.0-12.0) in the camostat mesilate group and 11.0 days (95% CI: 10.0-13.0) in the placebo group. Conversion to negative viral status by day 14 was observed in 45 of 74 patients (60.8%) in the camostat mesilate group and 47 of 74 patients (63.5%) in the placebo group. The primary (Bayesian) and secondary (frequentist) analyses found no significant differences in the primary endpoint between the two groups. No additional safety concerns beyond those already known for camostat mesilate were identified.

CONCLUSIONS:

Camostat mesilate did not substantially reduce the time to viral clearance, based on upper airway viral loads, compared with placebo for treating patients with mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection with or without symptoms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04657497. Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jRCT2031200198.

• Authors: Taku Kinoshita, Masahiro Shinoda, Yasuhiro Nishizaki, Katsuya Shiraki, Yuji Hirai, Yoshiko Kichikawa, Kenji Tsushima, Masaharu Shinkai, Naoyuki Komura, Kazuo Yoshida, Yasutoshi Kido, Hiroshi Kakeya, Naoto Uemura, Junichi Kadota
• Journal: BMC medicine (BMC Med) Vol. 20 Issue 1 Pg. 342 (09 27 2022) ISSN: 1741-7015 [Electronic] England
• PMID: 36163020 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial)
• Copyright: © 2022. The Author(s).

Chemical References

• Esters
• Guanidines
• camostat

Topics

• Bayes Theorem
• Double-Blind Method
• Esters (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
• Guanidines (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
• Humans
• SARS-CoV-2
• Treatment Outcome
• COVID-19 Drug Treatment