Abstract | OBJECTIVE: METHODS: The study protocol is available at OSF (https://osf.io/vhyct/). EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched until July 2020, using terms related to SIRT and hepatic metastases from UM. Studies reporting outcomes of SIRT in patients with UM and at least one hepatic metastasis were included. Data on overall survival (OS), hepatic progression free survival (hPFS) or tumor response were collected. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: 11 studies were included, reporting outcomes for 268 patients with hepatic metastases from UM. Most studies (n = 9, 81.8%) were retrospective. Disease control was achieved in 170 patients (67.5%) and the median OS from time of SIRT was 12.3 months. Median hPFS was 5.4 months. Low-grade side-effects were common but serious complications were infrequent. There were two treatment-related deaths. The median NOS score was 6 (moderate risk of bias). CONCLUSION:
SIRT appears to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from UM. The certainty of our results is unclear due to predominantly retrospective data with moderate risk of bias. Further prospective studies are required to explore the role of SIRT in UM. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:
SIRT appears to be a safe treatment for patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from UM. Further prospective work is required.
|
Authors | Harry Alexander, Daniel Wen, Michael Chu, Catherine Han, Peter Hadden, Robert Thomas, Adam Bartlett |
Journal | The British journal of radiology
(Br J Radiol)
Vol. 95
Issue 1129
Pg. 20210200
(Jan 01 2022)
ISSN: 1748-880X [Electronic] England |
PMID | 34757824
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Systematic Review)
|
Topics |
- Humans
- Liver Neoplasms
(mortality, radiotherapy, secondary)
- Melanoma
(mortality, pathology)
- Progression-Free Survival
- Radiotherapy
(adverse effects, methods)
- Uveal Neoplasms
(mortality, pathology)
|