HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Asthma-inducing potential of 28 substances in spray cleaning products-Assessed by quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) testing and literature review.

Abstract
Exposure to spray cleaning products constitutes a potential risk for asthma induction. We set out to review whether substances in such products are potential inducers of asthma. We identified 101 spray cleaning products for professional use. Twenty-eight of their chemical substances were selected. We based the selection on (a) positive prediction for respiratory sensitisation in humans based on quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) in the Danish (Q)SAR Database, (b) positive QSAR prediction for severe skin irritation in rabbits and (c) knowledge on the substances' physico-chemical characteristics and toxicity. Combining the findings in the literature and QSAR predictions, we could group substances into four classes: (1) some indication in humans for asthma induction: chloramine, benzalkonium chloride; (2) some indication in animals for asthma induction: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), citric acid; (3) equivocal data: hypochlorite; (4) few or lacking data: nitriloacetic acid, monoethanolamine, 2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethanol, 2-diethylaminoethanol, alkyldimethylamin oxide, 1-aminopropan-2-ol, methylisothiazolinone, benzisothiazolinone and chlormethylisothiazolinone; three specific sulphonates and sulfamic acid, salicylic acid and its analogue sodium benzoate, propane-1,2-diol, glycerol, propylidynetrimethanol, lactic acid, disodium malate, morpholine, bronopol and benzyl alcohol. In conclusion, we identified an asthma induction potential for some of the substances. In addition, we identified major knowledge gaps for most substances. Thus, more data are needed to feed into a strategy of safe-by-design, where substances with potential for induction of asthma are avoided in future (spray) cleaning products. Moreover, we suggest that QSAR predictions can serve to prioritise substances that need further testing in various areas of toxicology.
AuthorsNiels Hadrup, Marie Frederiksen, Eva B Wedebye, Nikolai G Nikolov, Tanja K Carøe, Jorid B Sørli, Karen B Frydendall, Biase Liguori, Camilla S Sejbaek, Peder Wolkoff, Esben M Flachs, Vivi Schlünssen, Harald W Meyer, Per A Clausen, Karin S Hougaard
JournalJournal of applied toxicology : JAT (J Appl Toxicol) Vol. 42 Issue 1 Pg. 130-153 (01 2022) ISSN: 1099-1263 [Electronic] England
PMID34247391 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review)
Copyright© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Toxicology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Chemical References
  • Cosmetics
  • Detergents
  • Soaps
Topics
  • Animals
  • Asthma
  • Cosmetics (toxicity)
  • Detergents (toxicity)
  • Humans
  • Occupational Exposure (adverse effects)
  • Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship
  • Respiratory System (drug effects, physiopathology)
  • Soaps (toxicity)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: