Moderately Hypofractionated Once-Daily Compared With Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiation Therapy Concurrently With Etoposide and Cisplatin in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Phase II, Randomized Trial.
Abstract | PURPOSE: METHODS AND MATERIALS: This multicenter, phase 2, randomized study enrolled patients aged 18 to 75 years old who had pathologically confirmed LS-SCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Eligible patients received 4 to 6 cycles of etoposide- cisplatin chemotherapy and were randomized to receive twice-daily CCTRT at 45 Gray (Gy) in 30 fractions or once-daily CCTRT at 65 Gy in 26 fractions, commencing with cycles 1 to 3 of chemotherapy. PCI was given to good responders. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The analyses included 182 patients, with 94 in the twice-daily group and 88 in the once-daily group. CCTRT started with cycle 3 of chemotherapy for most patients (80.2%). At a median follow-up of 24.3 months, the median PFS was 13.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8-16.0) in the twice-daily group versus 17.2 months (95% CI, 11.8-22.6) in the once-daily group (P = .031), with 2-year PFS rates of 28.4% (95% CI, 18.2-38.6) and 42.3% (95% CI, 31.1-53.5), respectively. The estimated overall survival was 33.6 months in the twice-daily group versus 39.3 months in the once-daily group (P = .137). The median locoregional PFS was 23.9 months in the twice-daily group and was not reached in the once-daily group (P = .017). The incidences of most toxicities were similar in both groups, except for a higher incidence of ≥grade 3 acute lymphopenia in the once-daily group (71.7% vs 40.2% in the twice-daily group; P < .001). There was no difference in the incidences of ≥grade 3 esophagitis (17.4% vs 15.3%, respectively), pneumonitis (3.3% vs 2.4%, respectively) or treatment-related death (2.2% vs 1.2%, respectively) between the once-daily and twice-daily groups. CONCLUSIONS: Moderately hypofractionated, once-daily CCTRT showed improved PFS and similar toxicities compared with twice-daily CCTRT in LS-SCLC. This regimen should be evaluated for comparison in a phase 3 randomized trial.
|
Authors | Bo Qiu, QiWen Li, JunLing Liu, Yan Huang, QingSong Pang, ZhengFei Zhu, Xi Yang, Bin Wang, Li Chen, JianLan Fang, MaoSheng Lin, XiaoBo Jiang, SuPing Guo, JinYu Guo, DaQuan Wang, FangJie Liu, Chu Chu, XiaoYan Huang, ChuanMiao Xie, Hui Liu |
Journal | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
(Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys)
Vol. 111
Issue 2
Pg. 424-435
(10 01 2021)
ISSN: 1879-355X [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 33992717
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase II, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Chemoradiotherapy
(adverse effects, methods)
- Cisplatin
(administration & dosage, adverse effects)
- Etoposide
(administration & dosage, adverse effects)
- Female
- Humans
- Lung Neoplasms
(mortality, therapy)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Radiation Dose Hypofractionation
- Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
(mortality, therapy)
|
|
Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!
Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease.
Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists
around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!
|