Drugs that inhibit dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) are conventionally regarded as
incretin-based agents that signal through the
glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor. However, inhibition of DPP-4 also potentiates the stem cell
chemokine, stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), which can promote
inflammation, proliferative responses and neovascularization. In large-scale cardiovascular outcome trials, enhanced
GLP-1 signaling has reduced the risk of atherosclerotic ischemic events, potentially because
GLP-1 retards the growth and increases the stability of
atherosclerotic plaques. However,
DPP-4 inhibitors have not reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, possibly because potentiation of SDF-1 enhances plaque growth and instability, activates deleterious neurohormonal mechanisms, and promotes cardiac
inflammation and
fibrosis. Similarly, trials with
GLP-1 agonists and
sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors have reported favorable effects on renal function, even after only 3-4 years of treatment. In contrast, no benefits on the rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate have been seen in trials of
DPP-4 inhibitors, perhaps because the renal actions of
DPP-4 inhibitors are primarily mediated by potentiation of SDF-1, not
GLP-1. Experimentally, SDF-1 can promote podocyte injury and glomerulosclerosis. Furthermore, the natriuretic action of SDF-1 occurs primarily in the distal tubules, where it cannot utilize tubuloglomerular feedback to modulate the deleterious effects of glomerular hyperfiltration. Potentiation of SDF-1 in experimental models may also exacerbate both retinopathy and neuropathy. Therefore, although
DPP-4 inhibitors have attractive clinical features, the benefits that might be expected from
GLP-1 signaling may be undermined by their actions to enhance SDF-1.