HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Is preoperative distinction between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis feasible without imaging?

AbstractBACKGROUND:
One of the main aims of appendicitis research is the differential diagnostics between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis that enable provision of the optimal treatment for each patient.
METHODS:
Data in the present study were collected prospectively in our randomized antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis trial (APPAC) comparing surgery and antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis (NCT01022567). We evaluated 705 patients who had acute appendicitis on computed tomography. Patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis (n = 368) were compared with all complicated acute appendicitis patients (n = 337), and subgroup analyses were performed between uncomplicated acute appendicitis and an appendicolith appendicitis (CA1; n = 256) and uncomplicated acute appendicitis and perforation and/or abscess (CA2; n = 78). Age, sex, body temperature (°C), duration of symptoms, white blood cell count (E9/L), and C-reactive protein (mg/L) were recorded on admission. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and temperature.
RESULTS:
CA2 patients had significantly greater C-reactive protein levels (mean 122 and 47, respectively, P < .001) and longer duration of symptoms than uncomplicated acute appendicitis patients; 81% of CA2 patients and 38% of uncomplicated acute appendicitis patients had symptoms >24 hours before admission (P < .001). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, C-reactive protein and temperature had clinically significant results only in comparison with uncomplicated acute appendicitis and CA2 (area under the curve >0.7), but no optimum cutoff points could be identified.
CONCLUSION:
In clinical decision making, neither clinical findings nor laboratory markers are reliable enough to estimate the severity of the acute appendicitis accurately or to determine the presence of an appendicolith. The current results emphasize the role of computed tomography in the differential diagnosis of complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
AuthorsElina Lietzén, Jari Mällinen, Juha M Grönroos, Tero Rautio, Hannu Paajanen, Pia Nordström, Markku Aarnio, Tuomo Rantanen, Juhani Sand, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Airi Jartti, Johanna Virtanen, Pasi Ohtonen, Paulina Salminen
JournalSurgery (Surgery) Vol. 160 Issue 3 Pg. 789-95 (09 2016) ISSN: 1532-7361 [Electronic] United States
PMID27267549 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Biomarkers
  • C-Reactive Protein
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Appendectomy
  • Appendicitis (blood, diagnosis, therapy)
  • Biomarkers (blood)
  • Body Temperature
  • C-Reactive Protein (metabolism)
  • Cohort Studies
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Leukocyte Count
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • ROC Curve
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: