HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Population-based studies about contact allergy are scarce.
OBJECTIVES:
To obtain reliable estimates of the prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in Europe.
METHODS:
A cross-sectional study of a random sample from the general population, aged 18-74 years, in five different European countries (Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Portugal). In total, 12 377 subjects were interviewed and a random sample (n = 3119) patch tested to TRUE Test panels 1-3 and Fragrance Mix (FM) II, hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC) and sesquiterpene lactone mix. A positive patch test reaction is considered as contact allergy.
RESULTS:
In total, 27·0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25·5-28·5] had at least one positive reaction to an allergen of the European baseline series, with a significantly higher prevalence in women than in men. The highest age-standardized prevalences (≥ 1%) were found for nickel (14·5%, 95% CI 13·2-15·8), thiomersal (5·0%, 95% CI 4·2-5·8), cobalt (2·2%, 95% CI 1·7-2·7), FM II (1·9%, 95% CI 1·5-2·5), FM I (1·8%, 95% CI 1·4-2·3), HICC (1·4%, 95% CI 1·0-1·9), p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin (1·3%, 95% CI 0·9-1·7) and para-phenylenediamine (1·0%, 95% CI 0·6-1·3). Only nickel and thiomersal showed a statistically significantly different prevalence for contact allergy among the different European populations. Subjects reporting contact dermatitis in their lifetime (age-standardized prevalence 15·1%, 95% CI 13·8-16·3) had an increased risk for contact allergy (odds ratio 1·9, 95% CI 1·5-2·5). The risk of having a contact allergy was not increased in those with atopic dermatitis (prevalence 7·6%, 95% CI 6·7-8·6; odds ratio 1·0, 95% CI 0·7-1·4).
CONCLUSIONS:
Contact allergy to at least one allergen of the European baseline series was diagnosed in more than one-quarter of the general European population. Therefore measures to improve the primary prevention of contact allergy have to be enforced.
AuthorsT L Diepgen, R F Ofenloch, M Bruze, P Bertuccio, S Cazzaniga, P-J Coenraads, P Elsner, M Goncalo, Å Svensson, L Naldi
JournalThe British journal of dermatology (Br J Dermatol) Vol. 174 Issue 2 Pg. 319-29 (Feb 2016) ISSN: 1365-2133 [Electronic] England
PMID26370659 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Copyright© 2015 British Association of Dermatologists.
Chemical References
  • Allergens
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Distribution
  • Aged
  • Allergens (adverse effects)
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Dermatitis, Allergic Contact (epidemiology)
  • Europe (epidemiology)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patch Tests
  • Prevalence
  • Residence Characteristics
  • Sex Distribution
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: