Abstract | OBJECTIVE: METHODS: A total of 172 women underwent cytology, HR-HPV DNA test, HR-HPV E6/7 mRNA test, colposcopy and biopsy. We compared the clinical performance of HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA test with Hybrid Capture 2 DNA test (HC-2) and Cervista HR-HPV DNA test on the cervical brush specimens during colposcopy and routine screening. The samples were histologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN II) or worse (CIN II+) as an endpoint. RESULTS: HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA positive rate was 37.9% in NILM, 67.9% in ASCUS and LSIL, 88.5% in ASC-H+. HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA positive rate was 38.6% in CIN I, 77.4% in CIN II-3 and 92.5% in SCC. HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA test showed a higher specificity than HC-2 and Cervista HPV DNA tests for high-grade lesions (61.4%, 54.3%, 55.7%, respectively, P < 0.05) and also a higher positive predictive value (75.9%, 74.8%, 74.6% respectively). Among three tests, HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA had the largest area of ROC curve and the best diagnostic value. CONCLUSION: HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA test has a performance more specific for detecting CIN II+ with the same sensitivity as HC-2 and Cervista HPV DNA tests. And it may serve as a more specific test for predicting the risk of progression and offer a viable tool for triage during cervical cancer screening.
|
Authors | Xuye Zhao, Yong Cui, Shufang Jiang, Yuanguang Meng, Aijun Liu, Linping Wei, Tongyu Liu, Haiqiong Han, Xiaosu Liu, Fuhong Liu, Yali Li |
Journal | Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
(Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi)
Vol. 94
Issue 43
Pg. 3432-5
(Nov 25 2014)
ISSN: 0376-2491 [Print] China |
PMID | 25622677
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
- DNA, Viral
- Oncogene Proteins, Viral
- RNA, Messenger
- RNA, Viral
|
Topics |
- Biopsy
- Colposcopy
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- DNA, Viral
- Early Detection of Cancer
- Female
- Humans
- Oncogene Proteins, Viral
- Papillomaviridae
- Pregnancy
- RNA, Messenger
- RNA, Viral
- Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
|