Abstract | BACKGROUND: Treatment planning of localised prostate cancer remains challenging. Besides conventional parameters, a wealth of prognostic biomarkers has been proposed so far. None of which, however, have successfully been implemented in a routine setting so far. The aim of our study was to systematically verify a set of published prognostic markers for prostate cancer. METHODS: Following an in-depth PubMed search, 28 markers were selected that have been proposed as multivariate prognostic markers for primary prostate cancer. Their prognostic validity was examined in a radical prostatectomy cohort of 238 patients with a median follow-up of 60 months and biochemical progression as endpoint of the analysis. Immunohistochemical evaluation was performed using previously published cut-off values, but allowing for optimisation if necessary. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used to determine the prognostic value of biomarkers included in this study. RESULTS: Despite the application of various cut-offs in the analysis, only four (14%) markers were verified as independently prognostic (AKT1, stromal AR, EZH2, and PSMA) for PSA relapse following radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Apparently, many immunohistochemistry-based studies on prognostic markers seem to be over-optimistic. Codes of best practice, such as the REMARK guidelines, may facilitate the performance of conclusive and transparent future studies.
|
Authors | F Huber, M Montani, T Sulser, R Jaggi, P Wild, H Moch, H Gevensleben, M Schmid, S Wyder, G Kristiansen |
Journal | British journal of cancer
(Br J Cancer)
Vol. 112
Issue 1
Pg. 140-8
(Jan 06 2015)
ISSN: 1532-1827 [Electronic] England |
PMID | 25422912
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Aged
- Biomarkers, Tumor
(analysis)
- Cohort Studies
- Disease Progression
- Humans
- Immunohistochemistry
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Multivariate Analysis
- Prognosis
- Proportional Hazards Models
- Prostatic Neoplasms
(chemistry)
|