HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Open, randomized, multi-center phase II study comparing efficacy and tolerability of Erlotinib vs. Carboplatin/Vinorelbin in elderly patients (>70 years of age) with untreated non-small cell lung cancer.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Targeting the epidermal-growth-factor-receptor (EGFR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an established treatment option with less toxicity compared to conventional chemotherapy. This study was undertaken to determine whether Erlotinib is non-inferior compared to chemotherapy as a first-line therapy in unselected elderly patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Patients ≥ 70 years with untreated, metastatic NSCLC were randomized to Erlotinib (E), 150 mg/day or Carboplatin (AUC5) plus Vinorelbine (25mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) every three weeks (CV). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). After progression, crossover was strongly recommended. Secondary endpoints were duration of response, 1-year survival, overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), quality of life (FACT-L), assessment of comorbidities by simplified comorbidity score (SCS) and Charlsons' comorbidity score, safety and assessment of molecular markers.
RESULTS:
Between June 2006 and August 2008 284 pts were randomized to E (144) and CV (140). PFS was significantly inferior with E (median PFS 2.4 versus 4.6 months [HR 1.6, 75% CI 1.22-2.09, p: 0.0005]) as well as RR (7.8% v 28.3%, p: 0.0001). No significant difference in OS appeared (median E: 7.3 months versus CV: 8.4 months, HR: 1.24 [75% CI 0.9-1.71]). In never smokers PFS (median PFS: 3.7 v 4.3 m, E v CV, HR 0.72, 75% CI 0.35-1.48) and OS (median: 16.5 versus 17 months, HR 0.99 [75% CI 0.38-2.57]) were comparable. More skin toxicity and diarrhea was seen with E compared to more myelotoxicity, neurotoxicity and constipation with CV. Less severe adverse events were observed with E (81 v 102, E v CV).
CONCLUSION:
CV had an increased efficacy compared with E in an unselected population of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.
AuthorsD F Heigener, K M Deppermann, J V Pawel, J R Fischer, C Kortsik, S Bohnet, M V Eiff, W Koester, M Thomas, P A Schnabel, M Reck
JournalLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (Lung Cancer) Vol. 84 Issue 1 Pg. 62-6 (Apr 2014) ISSN: 1872-8332 [Electronic] Ireland
PMID24560332 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase II, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial)
CopyrightCopyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Quinazolines
  • Vinblastine
  • Carboplatin
  • Erlotinib Hydrochloride
  • ErbB Receptors
  • Vinorelbine
Topics
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Carboplatin (administration & dosage)
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung (drug therapy, mortality, pathology)
  • ErbB Receptors (genetics)
  • Erlotinib Hydrochloride
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms (drug therapy, mortality, pathology)
  • Male
  • Mutation
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Quinazolines (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vinblastine (administration & dosage, analogs & derivatives)
  • Vinorelbine

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: