HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

The diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of extracranial carotid stenosis.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Extracranial atherosclerotic lesions of the carotid bifurcation cause 10% to 20% of all cases of cerebral ischemia. Until now, there have been no comprehensive evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for the management of patients with extracranial carotid stenosis in Germany and Austria.
METHODS:
The literature was systematically searched for pertinent publications (1990-2011). On the basis of 182 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 308 systematic reviews, 30 key questions were answered and evidence-based recommendations were issued.
RESULTS:
The prevalence of extracranial carotid stenosis is more than 5% from age 65 onward. Men are affected twice as frequently as women. The most important diagnostic technique is Doppler- and color-coded duplex ultrasonography. RCTs have shown that the treatment of high-grade asymptomatic carotid stenosis with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can lower the 5-year risk of stroke from 11% to 5%. Intensive conservative treatment may lower the stroke risk still further. Moreover, RCTs have shown that CEA for symptomatic 50% to 99% carotid stenosis lowers the 5-year stroke risk by 5% to 16%. Meta-analyses of the 13 available RCTs comparing carotid artery stenting (CAS) with CEA have shown that CAS is associated with a 2% to 2.5% higher risk of periprocedural stroke or death and with a 0.5% to 1% lower risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction. If no particular surgical risk factors are present, CEA is the standard treatment for high-grade carotid stenosis. CAS may be considered as an alternative to CEA if the rate of procedure-related stroke or death can be kept below 3% or 6% for asymptomatic and symptomatic stenosis, respectively.
CONCLUSION:
Further studies are needed so that better selection criteria can be developed for individually tailored treatment.
AuthorsHans-Henning Eckstein, Andreas Kühnl, Arnd Dörfler, Ina B Kopp, Holger Lawall, Peter A Ringleb, Multidisciplinary German-Austrian guideline based on evidence and consensus
JournalDeutsches Arzteblatt international (Dtsch Arztebl Int) Vol. 110 Issue 27-28 Pg. 468-76 (Jul 2013) ISSN: 1866-0452 [Electronic] Germany
PMID23964303 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)
Topics
  • Austria (epidemiology)
  • Cardiology (standards)
  • Carotid Stenosis (diagnosis, mortality, therapy)
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Germany (epidemiology)
  • Humans
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Prevalence
  • Survival Analysis
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vascular Surgical Procedures (mortality)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: