Prospective evaluation of the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis before cystoscopy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this study was to prospectively compare single-dose intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis vs. no prophylaxis before minor cystoscopic procedures, including punch biopsy and transurethral resection (TUR) of small bladder tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A total of 200 patients with a mean age of 47.3 years old (range: 19-84 years old) with initial negative urine cultures were recruited. All patients underwent a diagnostic cystoscopy. Patients were then randomized into 2 groups: One group that did not receive antibiotics (100 patients) and the other group that received antibiotic treatment (100 patients with a single intravenous dose of cefoperazone). All patients had urine analysis and urine cultures on the second day after the operation. Additionally, clinical parameters including fever and dysuria were recorded. In 15% of the patients, incidental additional interventions such as punch biopsy or TUR of a small bladder tumor that were similarly distributed in both groups were performed.

RESULTS:

In 1 patient from the antibiotic group and 2 patients from the no prophylaxis group, the urine cultures after cystoscopy were positive. No statistically significant difference was observed between these groups based on the microbiological and clinical parameters.

CONCLUSION:

The current study provides evidence that no antibiotic prophylaxis is required before diagnostic cystoscopy in patients without bacteriuria. But, the absolute risk of infection was small, suggesting that a much larger study is required.

• Authors: Kamil Cam, Ali Kayikci, Ali Erol
• Journal: Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India (Indian J Urol) Vol. 25 Issue 2 Pg. 203-6 (Apr 2009) ISSN: 0970-1591 [Print] India
• PMID: 19672347 (Publication Type: Journal Article)