HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Diurnal metabolic profiles after 14 d of an ad libitum high-starch, high-sucrose, or high-fat diet in normal-weight never-obese and postobese women.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The influence of the amount and type of carbohydrates in the diet on risk factors for obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE:
We investigated the effects of 2 low-fat diets (high-sucrose and high-starch) and a high-fat diet on glycemia, lipidemia, and hormonal responses in never-obese and postobese women.
DESIGN:
Eighteen normal-weight women (8 postobese and 10 never-obese) consumed 3 ad libitum diets (high-fat, high-starch, and high-sucrose) for 14 d each. On day 15, we measured fasting and postprandial glucose, lactate, insulin, triacylglycerol, nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), glycerol, glucagon, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and glucagon-like peptide 1.
RESULTS:
The high-sucrose diet induced significantly lower total areas under the curve (AUCs) for glucose and NEFA and a significantly higher lactate AUC than did the high-fat and high-starch diets; there were no significant differences in the insulin AUCs. The triacylglycerol AUC was greater with the high-fat and high-sucrose diets than with the high-starch diet. Gastrointestinal hormone concentrations differed between diets, but not between the 2 subject groups. Comparisons between subject groups for all diets combined showed lower relative insulin resistance and lower AUCs for glucose, insulin, and triacylglycerol in the postobese group.
CONCLUSIONS:
High-starch and high-sucrose diets had no adverse effects on postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, or lipidemia compared with a high-fat diet. A sucrose-rich diet may improve glucose metabolism, but may have an adverse effect on lipidemia, compared with a starch-rich diet. Postobese women seemed to be more insulin-sensitive and more efficient at storing triacylglycerol than were never-obese women, regardless of dietary composition.
AuthorsA Raben, J J Holst, J Madsen, A Astrup
JournalThe American journal of clinical nutrition (Am J Clin Nutr) Vol. 73 Issue 2 Pg. 177-89 (Feb 2001) ISSN: 0002-9165 [Print] United States
PMID11157312 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Blood Glucose
  • Dietary Fats
  • Dietary Sucrose
  • Fatty Acids, Nonesterified
  • Hormones
  • Insulin
  • Lipids
  • Lactic Acid
  • Starch
Topics
  • Adult
  • Area Under Curve
  • Blood Glucose (drug effects)
  • Body Weight
  • Circadian Rhythm (drug effects)
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Dietary Fats (administration & dosage, metabolism, pharmacology)
  • Dietary Sucrose (administration & dosage, metabolism, pharmacology)
  • Fatty Acids, Nonesterified (blood)
  • Female
  • Hormones (blood)
  • Humans
  • Insulin (metabolism)
  • Insulin Resistance
  • Lactic Acid (blood)
  • Lipids (blood)
  • Middle Aged
  • Obesity
  • Postprandial Period
  • Risk Factors
  • Starch (administration & dosage, metabolism, pharmacology)
  • Time Factors

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: