Standard
biomarkers have been widely used for
COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis. We hypothesize that thrombogenicity metrics measured by thromboelastography will provide better diagnostic and prognostic utility versus standard
biomarkers in
COVID-19 positive patients. In this observational prospective study, we included 119 hospitalized
COVID-19 positive patients and 15
COVID-19 negative patients. On admission, we measured standard
biomarkers and thrombogenicity using a novel thromboelastography assay (TEG-6s). In-hospital all-cause death and thrombotic occurrences (
thromboembolism,
myocardial infarction and
stroke) were recorded. Most
COVID-19 patients were African--Americans (68%).
COVID-19 patients versus
COVID-19 negative patients had higher platelet-
fibrin clot strength (P-FCS),
fibrin clot strength (FCS) and functional
fibrinogen level (FLEV) (P ≤ 0.003 for all). The presence of high TEG-6 s metrics better discriminated
COVID-19 positive from negative patients.
COVID-19 positive patients with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at least 3 had higher P-FCS, FCS and FLEV than patients with scores less than 3 (P ≤ 0.001 for all comparisons). By multivariate analysis, the in-hospital composite endpoint occurrence of death and thrombotic events was independently associated with SOFA score more than 3 [odds ratio (OR) = 2.9, P = 0.03], diabetes (OR = 3.3, P = 0.02) and FCS > 40 mm (OR = 3.4, P = 0.02). This largest observational study suggested the early diagnostic and prognostic utility of thromboelastography to identify
COVID-19 and should be considered hypothesis generating. Our results also support the recent FDA guidance regarding the importance of measurement of whole blood viscoelastic properties in
COVID-19 patients. Our findings are consistent with the observation of higher hospitalization rates and poorer outcomes for African--Americans with
COVID-19.