HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone Loss (CTIBL): State of the Art and Proper Management in Breast Cancer Patients on Endocrine Therapy.

AbstractOPINION STATEMENT:
About 70-80% of early breast cancer (BC) patients receive adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for at least 5 years. ET includes in the majority of cases the use of aromatase inhibitors, as upfront or switch strategy, that lead to impaired bone health. Given the high incidence and also the high prevalence of BC, cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) represents the most common long-term adverse event experimented by patients with hormone receptor positive tumours. CTIBL is responsible for osteoporosis occurrence and, as a consequence, fragility fractures that may negatively affect quality of life and survival expectancy. As recommended by main international guidelines, BC women on aromatase inhibitors should be carefully assessed for their fracture risk at baseline and periodically reassessed during adjuvant ET in order to early detect significant worsening in terms of bone health. Antiresorptive agents, together with adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, should be administered in BC patients during all course of ET, especially in those at high risk of osteoporotic fractures, as calculated by tools available for clinicians. Bisphosphonates, such as zoledronate or pamidronate, and anti-RANKL antibody, denosumab, are the two classes of antiresorptive drugs used in clinical practice with similar efficacy in preventing bone loss induced by aromatase inhibitor therapy. The choice between them, in the absence of direct comparison, should be based on patients' preference and compliance; the different safety profile is mainly related to the route of administration, although both types of drugs are manageable with due care, since most of the adverse events are predictable and preventable. Despite advances in management of CTIBL, several issues such as the optimal time of starting antiresorptive agents and the duration of treatment remain unanswered. Future clinical trials as well as increased awareness of bone health are needed to improve prevention, assessment and treatment of CTIBL in these long-term survivor patients.
AuthorsAnna Diana, Francesca Carlino, Emilio Francesco Giunta, Elisena Franzese, Luigi Pio Guerrera, Vincenzo Di Lauro, Fortunato Ciardiello, Bruno Daniele, Michele Orditura
JournalCurrent treatment options in oncology (Curr Treat Options Oncol) Vol. 22 Issue 5 Pg. 45 (04 16 2021) ISSN: 1534-6277 [Electronic] United States
PMID33864145 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review)
Chemical References
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Aromatase Inhibitors
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents
  • Diphosphonates
  • Denosumab
Topics
  • Antineoplastic Agents (adverse effects)
  • Aromatase Inhibitors (adverse effects)
  • Bone Density (drug effects)
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Breast Neoplasms (drug therapy)
  • Denosumab (therapeutic use)
  • Diphosphonates (therapeutic use)
  • Female
  • Fractures, Bone (prevention & control)
  • Humans
  • Osteoporosis (chemically induced, diagnosis, therapy)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: