De-Implementing Opioid Use and Implementing Optimal Pain Management Following Dental Extractions (DIODE): Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Trial.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Overdose deaths from prescription opioid analgesics are a continuing crisis in the United States. Opioid analgesics are among the most frequently prescribed drugs by dentists. An estimated 5 million people undergo third-molar extractions in the United States each year, resulting in postoperative pain. Studies show that, in most cases, the combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen is an effective alternative to commonly prescribed opioid analgesics for the management of postextraction pain. Nevertheless, many dentists routinely prescribe opioids after dental extractions.

OBJECTIVE:

We describe the rationale, design, and methods for a randomized trial of interventions designed to de-implement opioid prescribing by dentists while implementing effective nonopioid analgesics following dental extractions.

METHODS:

Using a prospective, 3-arm, cluster randomized trial design with dentists as the unit randomized and patient-level prescribing data as the primary outcome, we will compare different strategies to reduce the reliance on opioids and increase the use of alternative pain management approaches utilizing information support tools aimed at both providers and their patients. The study will test the efficacy of 2 interventions to decrease opioid prescribing following dental extractions: clinical decision support with (CDS-E) and without patient education (CDS). Providers will be randomized to CDS, CDS-E, or standard practice. Patient-level outcomes will be determined via review of comprehensive electronic health records. We will compare study arms on differential change in prescribing patterns from pre- to postimplementation of the intervention. The primary outcome of interest is a binary indicator of whether or not the patient received an opioid prescription on the day of the extraction encounter. We will also examine recommendations or prescriptions for nonopioid analgesics, patients' perceptions of shared decision making, and patients' pain experiences following the extraction.

RESULTS:

The HealthPartners Institutional Review Board approved the study. All study materials including the CDS and patient education materials have been developed and pilot tested, and the protocol has been approved by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. The intervention was implemented in February 2020, with 51 dentists who were randomized to 1 of the 3 arms.

CONCLUSIONS:

If the intervention strategies are shown to be effective, they could be implemented more broadly in dental settings with high levels of opioid prescribing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03584789, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03584789.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID):

DERR1-10.2196/24342.

• Authors: D Brad Rindal, Stephen E Asche, Jan Gryczynski, Sheryl M Kane, Anjali R Truitt, Tracy L Shea, Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss, Robert P Schwartz, Donald C Worley, Shannon G Mitchell
• Journal: JMIR research protocols (JMIR Res Protoc) Vol. 10 Issue 4 Pg. e24342 (Apr 12 2021) ISSN: 1929-0748 [Print] Canada
• PMID: 33843594 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
• Copyright: ©D Brad Rindal, Stephen E Asche, Jan Gryczynski, Sheryl M Kane, Anjali R Truitt, Tracy L Shea, Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss, Robert P Schwartz, Donald C Worley, Shannon G Mitchell. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 12.04.2021.