HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Impact of hydrostatic pressure on fractional flow reserve: in vivo experimental study of anatomical height difference of coronary arteries.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Although pressure equalization of the sensor-tipped guidewire and systemic pressure is mandatory in measuring fractional flow reserve (FFR), pressure in the distal artery (Pd) with wire advancement can be influenced by hydrostatic pressure related to the height difference between the catheter tip and the distal pressure sensor. We therefore analyzed the impact of hydrostatic pressure on FFR in vivo by modification of the height difference.
METHODS:
To reveal the anatomical height difference in human coronary arteries, measurement was performed during computed tomography angiography (CTA) of five consecutive patients. Utilizing the healthy coronary arteries of female swine, height difference diversity was reproduced by body rotation and vertical inclination. FFR measurements were performed during maximum hyperemia with adenosine. The height difference was calculated fluoroscopically with a contrast medium-filled balloon for reference.
RESULTS:
In human coronary CTA, height averages from the ostium in the left anterior descending artery (34.6 mm) were significantly higher than in the left circumflex (-15.5 mm, p = 0.008) and right coronary arteries (-2.3 mm, p = 0.008). In our swine model, reproduced height variation ranged from -7.2 cm to +6.5 cm. Mean FFR was significantly lower in positive sensor height and higher in negative sensor height compared to the reference height. Linear regression analyses revealed significant correlations between height difference and FFR, observed among all coronary arteries, as well as between the height difference and Pd-aortic pressure mismatch. Subtracting 0.622 mmHg/cm height difference from Pd could correct the expected hydrostatic pressure influence.
CONCLUSION:
Hydrostatic pressure variation resulting from sensor height influenced FFR values might affect interpretation during FFR assessment.
AuthorsSuguru Nagamatsu, Kenji Sakamoto, Takayoshi Yamashita, Ryota Sato, Noriaki Tabata, Kota Motozato, Kenshi Yamanaga, Miwa Ito, Koichiro Fujisue, Hisanori Kanazawa, Daisuke Sueta, Hiroki Usuku, Satoshi Araki, Yuichiro Arima, Seiji Takashio, Satoru Suzuki, Eiichiro Yamamoto, Yasuhiro Izumiya, Hirofumi Soejima, Daisuke Utsunomiya, Koichi Kaikita, Yasuyuki Yamashita, Kenichi Tsujita
JournalJournal of cardiology (J Cardiol) Vol. 76 Issue 1 Pg. 73-79 (07 2020) ISSN: 1876-4738 [Electronic] Netherlands
PMID32089479 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Topics
  • Animals
  • Computed Tomography Angiography
  • Coronary Vessels (anatomy & histology, diagnostic imaging, physiology)
  • Female
  • Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
  • Humans
  • Hydrostatic Pressure
  • Swine

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: