HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Presacral masses and sacrococcygeal teratomas in patients with and without anorectal malformations: A single institution comparative study.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Despite variability at presentation, presacral masses in patients with and without anorectal malformations (ARM) appear histologically similar. The purpose of this study was to identify differences in oncologic outcomes between these two groups.
METHODS:
A retrospective review was performed utilizing our institutional cancer and colorectal and pelvic reconstruction databases for patients with presacral masses and sacrococcygeal teratomas between 1990 and 2017. Data captured included age at surgical resection, type of ARM, tumor location within the pelvis, tumor histopathology, tumor size, adjuvant chemotherapy, recurrence, and follow-up.
RESULTS:
Forty-six patients comprised our cohort, of whom 12 had an ARM. The median age was older at resection for those with an ARM (1.4 years; range 1 day to 29.4 years) compared to those without an ARM (9 days; range 0 days to 6.9 years) (p = 0.01). The mean tumor size was 2.5 cm in patients with an ARM compared to 6.0 cm in patients without an ARM (p = 0.036). All patients with ARM had exclusively intrapelvic tumors, and histopathology included mature teratoma (8), yolk sac tumor (1), lipoma (1), and unknown (2). Tumor location for patients with sacral and presacral masses without ARM included exclusively extrapelvic (10), primarily extrapelvic with large intrapelvic component (7), primarily intrapelvic with extrapelvic component (1), exclusively intrapelvic (8), and unknown (8). Histopathology for patients with presacral masses without ARM included mature teratoma (20), immature teratoma (7), yolk sac tumor (3), ganglioneuroma (1), neuroblastoma (1), benign epithelial cyst (1), and unknown (1). Tumor recurrence rate was similar between patients with ARM (n = 3, 25%) and those without an ARM (n = 5, 15%) (p = 0.41). The 5-year event free survival was 65% (95% CI: 25%-87%) in the group with ARM and 81% (95% CI: 60%-92%) in the group without ARM (p = 0.44).
CONCLUSION:
Sacral and presacral masses in patients with ARM are resected at a later age and are more likely to be intrapelvic. They appear histologically similar and have similar rates of recurrence and malignancy when compared to patients without ARM.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:
III TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study.
AuthorsDevin R Halleran, Alejandra Vilanova-Sanchez, Carlos A Reck, Tassiana Maloof, Laura Weaver, Joseph Stanek, Marc A Levitt, Richard J Wood, Jennifer H Aldrink
JournalJournal of pediatric surgery (J Pediatr Surg) Vol. 54 Issue 7 Pg. 1372-1378 (Jul 2019) ISSN: 1531-5037 [Electronic] United States
PMID30630596 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
CopyrightCopyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Anorectal Malformations (pathology)
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Male
  • Retroperitoneal Neoplasms (pathology, therapy)
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sacrococcygeal Region (pathology)
  • Teratoma (pathology, surgery)
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: