HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Revascularization of radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis with carotid endarterectomy vs. carotid artery stenting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
The incidence of carotid artery stenosis after head and neck radiation is anticipated to rise due to the increasing survival of patients with head and neck malignancies. It remains unclear whether carotid artery stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA) is the best treatment strategy for radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis.
MATERIALS & METHODS:
This study was performed according to the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Eligible studies were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central until July 20, 2017. A meta-analysis of random effects model was conducted. The I-square statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity.
RESULTS:
Five studies and 143 patients were included. Periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and death rates were similar between the two revascularization approaches. However, the risk for cranial nerve (CN) injury was higher in the CEA group (OR: 7.09; 95% CI: 1.17-42.88; I2 = 0%). CEA was associated with lower mortality rates after a mean follow-up of 50 months (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09-0.97; I2 = 0%). No difference was identified in long-term restenosis rates between CEA and CAS.
CONCLUSIONS:
Patients with radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis can safely undergo both CAS and CEA with similar risks of periprocedural stroke, MI and death. However, patients treated with CEA have a higher risk for periprocedural CN injuries and a lower risk for long-term mortality.
AuthorsStefanos Giannopoulos, Pavlos Texakalidis, Anil Kumar Jonnalagadda, Theofilos Karasavvidis, Spyridon Giannopoulos, Damianos G Kokkinidis
JournalCardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions (Cardiovasc Revasc Med) 2018 Jul - Aug Vol. 19 Issue 5 Pt B Pg. 638-644 ISSN: 1878-0938 [Electronic] United States
PMID29422277 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review)
CopyrightCopyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Topics
  • Aged
  • Carotid Stenosis (diagnostic imaging, etiology, mortality, surgery)
  • Endarterectomy, Carotid (adverse effects, mortality)
  • Endovascular Procedures (adverse effects, instrumentation, mortality)
  • Female
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms (radiotherapy)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications (etiology)
  • Radiation Injuries (diagnostic imaging, etiology, mortality, surgery)
  • Radiotherapy (adverse effects)
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Stents
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: