HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Efficacy of NEPA (netupitant/palonosetron) across multiple cycles of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: A subanalysis from two phase III trials.

AbstractOBJECTIVES:
Breast cancer (BC) patients represent a high-risk population for experiencing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), since they frequently receive highly emetogenic anthracycline-cyclophosphamide-based (AC) chemotherapy, and are often female and young, two predisposing risk factors for CINV. Guidelines recommend the combination of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA), 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 RA (5-HT3RA), and dexamethasone (DEX) for CINV prophylaxis in AC-treated patients. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of NEPA, a fixed combination of netupitant (NETU [NK1RA]) and palonosetron (PALO [5-HT3RA]) in BC patients from two phase III studies.
METHODS:
Overall, 1460 BC patients received AC (Study 1) or non-AC (Study 2) therapy over 6060 cycles. Randomized patients received DEX with either NEPA or oral PALO (Study 1), or NEPA or aprepitant+oral PALO (Study 2) before chemotherapy.
RESULTS:
In AC-receiving patients, overall complete response (CR) rates with NEPA+DEX were statistically significantly higher than oral PALO+DEX rates (cycles 1-4: 73.9% vs 65.9%, 80.0% vs 66.0%, 83.6% vs 69.9%, 83.6% vs 74.4%, respectively). Overall, no significant nausea (NSN) rates were also superior with NEPA+DEX vs oral PALO+DEX (respectively, 74.2%-79.9% vs 68.5%-74.9%). A greater proportion of NEPA+DEX patients experienced "no-impact-on-daily-life" due to CINV (78.4% vs 71.4%) in cycle 1. In non-AC-receiving patients, prophylaxis with NEPA+DEX resulted in high CR and NSN rates across 1-4 chemotherapy cycles; no formal comparison with the control arm was performed.
CONCLUSION:
NEPA+DEX administered as a single dose is an effective option for preventing CINV in BC patients receiving AC and non-AC, across multiple chemotherapy cycles.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBERS:
Study 1: NCT01339260, Study 2:NCT01376297.
AuthorsHope S Rugo, Giorgia Rossi, Giada Rizzi, Matti Aapro
JournalBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland) (Breast) Vol. 33 Pg. 76-82 (Jun 2017) ISSN: 1532-3080 [Electronic] Netherlands
PMID28285236 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis)
CopyrightCopyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Anthracyclines
  • Antiemetics
  • Drug Combinations
  • Isoquinolines
  • Pyridines
  • Quinuclidines
  • netupitant, palosentron drug combination
  • Dexamethasone
  • Cyclophosphamide
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anthracyclines (adverse effects)
  • Antiemetics (administration & dosage)
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
  • Breast Neoplasms (drug therapy)
  • Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
  • Cyclophosphamide (adverse effects)
  • Dexamethasone (administration & dosage)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Combinations
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Isoquinolines (administration & dosage)
  • Middle Aged
  • Nausea (chemically induced, prevention & control)
  • Pyridines (administration & dosage)
  • Quinuclidines (administration & dosage)
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vomiting (chemically induced, prevention & control)
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: