This was a nonrandomized, open-label, controlled, longitudinal observational study of
IVIg use in pediatric
narcolepsy with retrospective data collection from medical files obtained from a single pediatric national reference center for the treatment of
narcolepsy in France. Of 56 consecutively referred patients with
narcolepsy, 24 received
IVIg (3 infusions administered at 1-mo intervals) in addition to standard care (psychostimulants and/or anticataplectic agents), and 32 continued on standard care alone (controls).
RESULTS: For two patients in each group, medical files were unavailable. Of the 22
IVIg patients, all had cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
hypocretin ≤ 110 pg/mL and were
HLA-DQB1*06:02 positive. Of the 30 control patients, 29 were
HLA-DQB1*06:02 positive and of those with available CSF measurements, all 12 had
hypocretin ≤ 110 pg/mL. Compared with control patients,
IVIg patients had shorter disease duration, shorter latency to sleep onset, and more had received H1N1 vaccination. Mean (standard deviation) follow-up length was 2.4 (1.1) y in the
IVIg group and 3.9 (1.7) y in controls. In multivariate-adjusted linear mixed-effects analyses of change from baseline in Ullanlinna
Narcolepsy Scale (UNS) scores, high baseline UNS, but not
IVIg treatment, was associated with a reduction in
narcolepsy symptoms. On time-to-event analysis, among patients with high baseline UNS scores, control patients achieved a UNS score < 14 (indicating remission) less rapidly than
IVIg patients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.18; 95% confidence interval: 95% confidence interval: 0.03, 0.95; p = 0.043). Shorter or longer disease duration did not influence treatment response in any analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall,
narcolepsy symptoms were not significantly reduced by
IVIg. However, in patients with high baseline symptoms, a subset of
IVIg-treated patients achieved remission more rapidly than control patients.
COMMENTARY: A commentary on this article appears in this issue on page 363.