Acute Cholecystitis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The treatment of acute cholecystitis has been controversially discussed in the literature as there are no high-evidence-level data yet for determining the optimal point in time for surgical intervention. So far, the laparoscopic removal of the gallbladder within 72 h has been the most preferred approach in acute cholecystitis.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic review by including randomized trials of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

RESULTS:

Based on a few prospective studies and two meta-analyses, there was consent to prefer an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients suffering from acute calculous cholecystitis while the term 'early' has not been consistently defined yet. So far, there is new level 1b evidence brought forth by the so-called 'ACDC' study which has convincingly shown in a prospective randomized setting that immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy - within a time frame of 24 h after hospital admission - is the smartest approach in ASA I-III patients suffering from acute calculous cholecystitis compared to a more conservative approach with a delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after an initial antibiotic treatment in terms of morbidity, length of hospital stay, and overall treatment costs. Concerning critically ill patients suffering from acute calculous or acalculous cholecystitis, there is no consensus in treatment due to missing data in the literature.

CONCLUSION:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within 24 h after hospital admission is a safe procedure and should be the preferred treatment for ASA I-III patients. In critically ill patients, the intervention should be determined by a narrow interdisciplinary consent based on the patient's individual comorbidities.

• Authors: Jochen Schuld, Matthias Glanemann
• Journal: Viszeralmedizin (Viszeralmedizin) Vol. 31 Issue 3 Pg. 163-5 (Jun 2015) ISSN: 1662-6664 [Print] Switzerland
• PMID: 26468309 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)