HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Randomized clinical trial of donor-site wound dressings after split-skin grafting.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The aim was to study which dressing material was best for healing donor-site wounds (DSWs) after split-skin grafting as there is wide variation in existing methods, ranging from classical gauze dressings to modern silicone dressings.
METHODS:
This 14-centre, six-armed randomized clinical trial (stratified by centre) compared six wound dressing materials in adult patients with DSWs larger than 10 cm(2) . Primary outcomes were time to complete re-epithelialization and pain scores measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) over 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included itching (VAS, over 4 weeks), adverse events and scarring after 12 weeks rated using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).
RESULTS:
Between October 2009 and December 2011, 289 patients were randomized (of whom 288 were analysed) to either alginate (45), film (49), gauze (50), hydrocolloid (49), hydrofibre (47) or silicone (48) dressings. Time to complete re-epithelialization using hydrocolloid dressings was 7 days shorter than when any other dressing was used (median 16 versus 23 days; P < 0·001). Overall pain scores were low, and slightly lower with use of film dressings (P = 0·038). The infection rate among patients treated with gauze was twice as high as in those who had other dressings (18 versus 7·6 per cent; relative risk 2·38, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·14 to 4·99). Patients who had a film dressing were least satisfied with overall scar quality.
CONCLUSION:
This trial showed that use of hydrocolloid dressings led to the speediest healing of DSWs. Gauze dressing should be discontinued as they caused more infections.
REGISTRATION NUMBER:
NTR1849 (http://www.trialregister.nl).
AuthorsF E Brölmann, A M Eskes, J C Goslings, F B Niessen, R de Bree, A C Vahl, E G Pierik, H Vermeulen, D T Ubbink, REMBRANDT study group
JournalThe British journal of surgery (Br J Surg) Vol. 100 Issue 5 Pg. 619-27 (Apr 2013) ISSN: 1365-2168 [Electronic] England
PMID23460253 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Copyright© 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Topics
  • Bandages
  • Cicatrix (etiology)
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain, Postoperative (etiology)
  • Pruritus (etiology)
  • Skin Transplantation (methods)
  • Surgical Wound Infection (etiology)
  • Transplant Donor Site
  • Transplantation, Autologous (methods)
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wound Healing (physiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: