HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Nonvitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AbstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
To assess whether the combined analysis of all phase III trials of nonvitamin-K-antagonist (non-VKA) oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack shows a significant difference in efficacy or safety compared with warfarin.
METHODS:
We searched PubMed until May 31, 2012, for randomized clinical trials using the following search items: atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation, warfarin, and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack. Studies had to be phase III trials in atrial fibrillation patients comparing warfarin with a non-VKA currently on the market or with the intention to be brought to the market in North America or Europe. Analysis was performed on intention-to-treat basis. A fixed-effects model was used as more appropriate than a random-effects model when combining a small number of studies.
RESULTS:
Among 47 potentially eligible articles, 3 were included in the meta-analysis. In 14 527 patients, non-VKAs were associated with a significant reduction of stroke/systemic embolism (odds ratios, 0.85 [95% CI, 074-0.99]; relative risk reduction, 14%; absolute risk reduction, 0.7%; number needed to treat, 134 over 1.8-2.0 years) compared with warfarin. Non-VKAs were also associated with a significant reduction of major bleeding compared with warfarin (odds ratios, 0.86 [95% CI, 075-0.99]; relative risk reduction, 13%; absolute risk reduction, 0.8%; number needed to treat, 125), mainly driven by the significant reduction of hemorrhagic stroke (odds ratios, 0.44 [95% CI, 032-0.62]; relative risk reduction, 57.9%; absolute risk reduction, 0.7%; number needed to treat, 139).
CONCLUSIONS:
In the context of the significant limitations of combining the results of disparate trials of different agents, non-VKAs seem to be associated with a significant reduction in rates of stroke or systemic embolism, hemorrhagic stroke, and major bleeding when compared with warfarin in patients with previous stroke or transient ischemic attack.
AuthorsGeorge Ntaios, Vasileios Papavasileiou, Hans-Christoph Diener, Konstantinos Makaritsis, Patrik Michel
JournalStroke (Stroke) Vol. 43 Issue 12 Pg. 3298-304 (Dec 2012) ISSN: 1524-4628 [Electronic] United States
PMID23150654 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review, Systematic Review)
Chemical References
  • Anticoagulants
  • Azetidines
  • Benzylamines
  • Vitamin K
  • ximelagatran
  • Warfarin
Topics
  • Administration, Oral
  • Anticoagulants (administration & dosage)
  • Atrial Fibrillation (drug therapy)
  • Azetidines (administration & dosage)
  • Benzylamines (administration & dosage)
  • Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
  • Humans
  • Ischemic Attack, Transient (drug therapy, prevention & control)
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Stroke (drug therapy, prevention & control)
  • Vitamin K (antagonists & inhibitors)
  • Warfarin (administration & dosage)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: