HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Efficacy and safety of extended- versus immediate-release pramipexole in Japanese patients with advanced and L-dopa-undertreated Parkinson disease: a double-blind, randomized trial.

AbstractOBJECTIVES:
To compare the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and trough plasma levels of pramipexole extended-release (ER) and pramipexole immediate-release (IR), and to assess the effects of overnight switching from an IR to an ER formulation, in L-dopa-treated patients with Parkinson disease (PD).
METHODS:
After a 1- to 4-week screening/enrollment, 112 patients who had exhibited L-dopa-related problems or were receiving suboptimal L-dopa dosage were randomized in double-blind, double-dummy, 1:1 fashion to pramipexole ER once daily or pramipexole IR 2 to 3 times daily for 12 weeks, both titrated to a maximum daily dose of 4.5 mg. Successful completers of double-blind treatment were switched to open-label pramipexole ER, beginning with a 4-week dose-adjustment phase.
RESULTS:
Among the double-blind treatment patients (n = 56 in each group), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Parts II+III total scores decreased significantly from baseline and to a similar degree with pramipexole ER and IR formulations. In each group, 47 double-blind patients (83.9%) reported adverse events (AEs), requiring withdrawal of 3 ER patients (5.4%) and 2 IR patients (3.6%). Trough plasma levels at steady state (at the same doses and dose-normalized concentrations) were also similar with both formulations. Among open-label treatment patients (n = 53 from IR to ER), 83% were successfully switched (no worsening of PD symptoms) to pramipexole ER.
CONCLUSIONS:
In L-dopa-treated patients, pramipexole ER and pramipexole IR demonstrated similar efficacy, safety, tolerability, and trough plasma levels. Patients can be safely switched overnight from pramipexole IR to pramipexole ER with no impact on efficacy.
AuthorsYoshikuni Mizuno, Mitsutoshi Yamamoto, Sadako Kuno, Kazuko Hasegawa, Nobutaka Hattori, Tatsuro Kagimura, Akiko Sarashina, Olivier Rascol, Anthony H V Schapira, Paolo Barone, Robert A Hauser, Werner Poewe, Pramipexole ER Study Group
JournalClinical neuropharmacology (Clin Neuropharmacol) 2012 Jul-Aug Vol. 35 Issue 4 Pg. 174-81 ISSN: 1537-162X [Electronic] United States
PMID22801294 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Benzothiazoles
  • Delayed-Action Preparations
  • Levodopa
  • Pramipexole
Topics
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Asian People (ethnology)
  • Benzothiazoles (administration & dosage)
  • Delayed-Action Preparations (administration & dosage)
  • Disorders of Excessive Somnolence (chemically induced)
  • Dizziness (chemically induced)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Drug Substitution (methods)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Levodopa (administration & dosage)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Parkinson Disease (drug therapy, ethnology, pathology)
  • Pramipexole
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: