[Therapeutic efficacy analysis of bronchoscopic interventional therapy on severe tuberculous main bronchial stenosis complicated with unilateral atelectasis].
|
| Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To observe the therapeutic efficacy of bronchoscopic interventional therapy on severe tuberculous main bronchial stenosis or atresia complicated with unilateral atelectasis. METHODS: Ninety patients with severe tuberculous main bronchial stenosis or atresia complicated with unilateral atelectasis, who had received bronchoscopic interventional therapy, were divided into group A and B according to whether stents had been implanted or not. Patients in group A had been treated with electrocautery, balloon dilatation and cryotherapy. Group B had been treated with metallic stent implantation on the basis of the above interventional management. In order to observe the effectiveness, the time needed for taking effect and restenosis rate were noted. The efficacy between patients with different disease courses, radiology, bronchoscopy and dyspnea index were evaluated before treatment and after the patients' conditions were stable. RESULTS: Three months after treatment, the good response rate and the total effective rate of group B were higher than those of group A, 97% vs 42% (χ(2) = 29.595, P < 0.05), 100% vs 81% (χ(2) = 6.060, P < 0.05), respectively. The time needed for taking effect in group B was significantly shorter than that in group A, 0.25 month vs 1.6 month. The dyspnea indexes of both groups were significantly improved after treatment, but the improvement of group B was more significant than that of group A (u = -2.478, P < 0.05). The disease course of patients with different therapeutic efficacy was evaluated, and the median disease course was 2 months in good response efficacy patients, 3.5 months in improved patients, and 5 months in ineffective patients; the difference being significant between ineffective and good response efficacy patients (u = -3.079, P < 0.01). The restenosis rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A, 72% vs 32% (χ(2) = 9.090, P < 0.01). The median restenosis time was 4 months in group A, and 6 months in group B. Bronchoscopy follow-up 12 months after the initial effective treatment showed that the good response rate and the total effective rate of group B were better than those of group A, 60% vs 29% (χ(2) = 10.559, P < 0.01), 88% vs 60% (χ(2) = 10.261, P < 0.01, respectively), and the total effective rate of main bronchial atresia patients in group B was significantly higher than that in group A, 90% vs 50% (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in effectiveness between severe stenosis and atresia patients in group A and B. CONCLUSION:
Electrocautery, balloon dilatation, cryotherapy and stent implantation were effective methods to treat severe tuberculous main bronchial stenosis or atresia complicated with unilateral atelectasis. Among them, the therapeutic efficacy was better and the symptoms improved more quickly in patients with stent implantation. The efficacy of stent implantation was better than that of conventional interventional therapy, but the incidence of restenosis was also higher. Following-up should be emphasized in this group of patients. Disease courses were associated with the therapeutic efficacy; longer disease course was related to worse therapeutic efficacy, and restenosis occurred earlier. So interventional therapy should be initiated earlier for bronchial tuberculosis with dyspnea, especially for that complicated by atelectasis.
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Yi Li, Xiao-peng Yao, Chong Bai, Yi Huang, Qin Wang, Li-Jun Zhao, Yu-chao Dong, Hai-ying Teng, Qiang Li |
| Journal | Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases (Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi) Vol. 34 Issue 6 Pg. 454-8 (Jun 2011) ISSN: 1001-0939 [Print] China |
| PMID | 21781520 (Publication Type: English Abstract, Journal Article) |
| Topics |
|
Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!