HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years.

AbstractPURPOSE:
We assessed the clinical and radiologic results of a cemented all-polyethylene convex-back keeled glenoid component used with a third-generation prosthesis.
METHODS:
Between 1996 and 2003, in 4 European centers, 333 shoulder arthroplasties were performed for primary osteoarthritis by use of a cemented all-polyethylene convex-back keeled glenoid component. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed, and clinical outcome was assessed with the Constant score, range of motion, and subjective evaluation.
RESULTS:
At a mean of 89.5 months' follow-up, the Constant score improved from 31.4 to 67.6 points (P < .0001). Active forward elevation improved from 94.9° to 146.6° (P < .0001) and external rotation from 9.0° to 35.3° (P < .0001). Of the patients, 93.5% were either satisfied or very satisfied. The rate of revision for glenoid loosening was 0.6%; however, the rate of radiologic glenoid loosening was 18.9%. Glenoid survival was 99.7% at 5 years and 98.3% at 10 years with endpoint defined as revision surgery for glenoid loosening and 99.7% at 5 years and 51.5% at 10 years with endpoint defined as radiologic loosening.
CONCLUSIONS:
We showed highly satisfactory clinical outcomes and extremely low rates of revision for glenoid loosening using a cemented convex-back keeled glenoid. There was a concerning rate of radiologic loosening, which only became apparent after 5 years, and this was associated with excessive glenoid reaming. Because radiologic changes are progressive and precede the need for revision, innovations in this field need to report radiologic and clinical results with follow-up of at least 5 to 10 years to prove any superiority.
AuthorsGilles Walch, Allan A Young, Barbara Melis, Dominique Gazielly, Markus Loew, Pascal Boileau
JournalJournal of shoulder and elbow surgery (J Shoulder Elbow Surg) Vol. 20 Issue 3 Pg. 385-94 (Apr 2011) ISSN: 1532-6500 [Electronic] United States
PMID21055972 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study)
CopyrightCopyright © 2011. Published by Mosby, Inc.
Topics
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement
  • Cementation
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Joint Prosthesis
  • Osteoarthritis (surgery)
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Reoperation
  • Shoulder Joint (surgery)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: