HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Abstract
Accurate Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margin (SM) information is critical for the planning of post-radical prostatectomy management in patients with prostate cancer. Although interobserver variability for Gleason score among urologic pathologists has been well documented, such data for pathologic stage and SM assessment are limited. We report the first study to address interobserver variability in a group of expert pathologists concerning extraprostatic soft tissue (EPE) and SM interpretation for radical prostatectomy specimens. A panel of 3 urologic pathologists selected 6 groups of 10 slides designated as being positive, negative, or equivocal for either EPE or SM based on unanimous agreement. Twelve expert urologic pathologists, who were blinded to the panel diagnoses, reviewed 40x whole-slide scans and provided diagnoses for EPE and SM on each slide. On the basis of panel diagnoses, as the gold standard, specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy values were high for both EPE (87.5%, 95.0%, and 91.2%) and SM (97.5%, 83.3%, and 90.4%). Overall kappa values for all 60 slides were 0.74 for SM and 0.63 for EPE. The kappa values were higher for slides with definitive gold standard EPE (kappa=0.81) and SM (kappa=0.73) diagnoses when compared with the EPE (kappa=0.29) and SM (kappa=0.62) equivocal slides. This difference was markedly pronounced for EPE. Urologic pathologists show good to excellent agreement when evaluating EPE and SM. Interobserver variability for EPE and SM interpretation was principally related to the lack of a clearly definable prostatic capsule and crush/thermal artifact along the edge of the gland, respectively.
AuthorsAndrew J Evans, Pauline C Henry, Theodorus H Van der Kwast, Douglas C Tkachuk, Kemp Watson, Gina A Lockwood, Neil E Fleshner, Carol Cheung, Eric C Belanger, Mahul B Amin, Liliane Boccon-Gibod, David G Bostwick, Lars Egevad, Jonathan I Epstein, David J Grignon, Edward C Jones, Rodolfo Montironi, Madeleine Moussa, Joan M Sweet, Kiril Trpkov, Thomas M Wheeler, John R Srigley
JournalThe American journal of surgical pathology (Am J Surg Pathol) Vol. 32 Issue 10 Pg. 1503-12 (Oct 2008) ISSN: 1532-0979 [Electronic] United States
PMID18708939 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study)
Topics
  • Adenocarcinoma (pathology, surgery)
  • Europe
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • North America
  • Observer Variation
  • Pathology, Surgical
  • Patient Selection
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prostate (pathology, surgery)
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostatic Neoplasms (pathology, surgery)
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Urology

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: