Abstract | PURPOSE: To accurately assess the relationship between nerve sparing radical prostatectomy and urinary continence using an anonymous validated survey in men undergoing surgical treatment for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 1999 to February 2006, men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) by one surgeon were given the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index to complete preop, and then annually thereafter to 2 years. We have 285 men who have completed the pre-op and year 1 and /or year 2 surveys. Continence was defined as requiring "no pads" on the survey. Analysis was based on attempted nerve sparing status of the surgery; none, unilateral, or bilateral. Subgroup analysis was then performed on successful nerve sparing surgery, defined as men responding they have an erection "firm enough for intercourse." RESULTS: Overall continence rates were 81% at year 1 and 87% at year 2. Attempted nerve sparing surgery, or successful nerve sparing surgery, did not result in better rates of continence than non-nerve sparing surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Using a validated survey with anonymous data collection, we found no improvement in continence, defined as pad-free, with attempted or successful nerve sparing RP. Based on our study, the goal of improving urinary outcomes should not be used as a justification for a nerve sparing template at radical prostatectomy.
|
Authors | David T Tzou, Bruce L Dalkin, Bea Anne Christopher, Haiyan Cui |
Journal | Urologic oncology
(Urol Oncol)
2009 Jul-Aug
Vol. 27
Issue 4
Pg. 358-62
ISSN: 1873-2496 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 18439849
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Aged
- Erectile Dysfunction
(etiology)
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neurons
(pathology)
- Prostate
(innervation, surgery)
- Prostatectomy
(adverse effects, methods)
- Prostatic Neoplasms
(complications, surgery)
- Quality of Life
- Research Design
- Treatment Outcome
- Urinary Incontinence
(etiology)
|