Abstract | BACKGROUND: OBJECTIVES: The goals for this study were: (1) to evaluate the frequency and pattern of allergic patch-test reactions to topical anesthetics, using North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) data, and (2) to compare these results to allergen frequencies from other published studies. METHODS: RESULTS: Of patch-tested patients, 344 (3.4%) had an allergic reaction to at least one anesthetic. Of those, 320 (93.0%) had an allergic reaction to only one topical anesthetic. Overall, reactions to benzocaine (50.0%, 172 of 344) were most prevalent, followed by reactions to dibucaine (27.9%, 96 of 344); however, reactions to dibucaine were significantly more frequent in Canada than in the United States (relative risk [RR], 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67-3.20; p < .0001). Of patients reacting to more than one anesthetic, most (79%, 19 of 24) reacted to both an amide and an ester. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | Erin M Warshaw, Sarah E Schram, Donald V Belsito, Vincent A DeLeo, Joseph F Fowler Jr, Howard I Maibach, James G Marks Jr, C G Toby Mathias, Melanie D Pratt, Robert L Rietschel, Denis Sasseville, Frances J Storrs, James S Taylor, Kathryn A Zug |
Journal | Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug
(Dermatitis)
2008 Mar-Apr
Vol. 19
Issue 2
Pg. 81-5
ISSN: 2162-5220 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 18413108
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Chemical References |
- Anesthetics, Local
- Prilocaine
- Tetracaine
- Lidocaine
- Dibucaine
- Benzocaine
|
Topics |
- Administration, Topical
- Anesthetics, Local
(adverse effects)
- Benzocaine
(adverse effects)
- Canada
(epidemiology)
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
(diagnosis, epidemiology, etiology)
- Dibucaine
(adverse effects)
- Female
- Humans
- Lidocaine
(adverse effects)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Patch Tests
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Prilocaine
(adverse effects)
- Retrospective Studies
- Risk Factors
- Tetracaine
(adverse effects)
- United States
(epidemiology)
|