Abstract | CONTEXT: To increase detection, urine samples from young males could be opportunistically tested for Chlamydia trachomatis. OBJECTIVE: To determine C. trachomatis prevalence in urine, optimum specimen and compare sensitivity/feasibility of routine use of different testing methods. DESIGN: Group A, 'sterile' pyuria samples June 1998-January 1999, tested by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and, if reactive, by immunofluorescence (IF). Subsequently batch-tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Group B, consecutive urine samples October 1998-January 1999; batch-tested by PCR. SETTING: Microbiology laboratory. SAMPLES: From males aged 18-30 years; group A = 71, group B = 83. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Chlamydia trachomatis positive if EIA- and IF- or PCR-positive. RESULTS: Group A: 12 EIA/IF-positive; 9/12 and 15 EIA-negative samples PCR-positive. Group B: 11 PCR-positive; 8/11 showed 'sterile' pyuria. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunistic testing of urine from young men shows a significant number of C. trachomatis infections. 'Sterile' pyuria samples are optimal. EIA/IF are less sensitive than PCR but can be routinely performed and detect a significant proportion of cases.
|
Authors | Adriana Basarab, David Browning, Stuart Lanham, Susan O'Connell |
Journal | The journal of family planning and reproductive health care
(J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care)
Vol. 28
Issue 1
Pg. 36-7
(Jan 2002)
ISSN: 1471-1893 [Print] England |
PMID | 16259815
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Chlamydia Infections
(epidemiology, urine)
- Chlamydia trachomatis
(isolation & purification)
- Humans
- Immunoenzyme Techniques
- Male
- Pilot Projects
- Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Prevalence
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- United Kingdom
(epidemiology)
|