Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: Eight cancer and two noncancer amputees with established, disabling phantom pain received oral DM 60 or 90 mg twice daily (BID) in a three-period double-blind crossover placebo-controlled trial. This followed an open-phase trial in which either dose was given three times daily if pain relief during the double-blind phase was <50% of pretreatment intensity. Patients then underwent a 3-month phase of treatment with the best regimen and a subsequent 1-month posttreatment follow-up. RESULTS: All patients reported a >50% decrease in pain intensity, better mood, and lower sedation in each treatment phase. Four individuals reported this level of pain relief with the 60-mg and one with the 90-mg BID regimen during the double-blind phase, whereas two amputees benefited from the 60-mg and three from the 90-mg thrice-daily regimen in the open-phase trial. One reported exacerbation of pain with the 90-mg BID regimen, and three reported pain rebound at the 1-month posttreatment follow-up phase. Three patients stopped all previous analgesic use during the study. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | Ron Ben Abraham, Nissim Marouani, Avi A Weinbroum |
Journal | Annals of surgical oncology
(Ann Surg Oncol)
Vol. 10
Issue 3
Pg. 268-74
(Apr 2003)
ISSN: 1068-9265 [Print] United States |
PMID | 12679312
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists
- Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate
|
Topics |
- Administration, Oral
- Adult
- Affect
- Aged
- Amputation, Surgical
- Cross-Over Studies
- Double-Blind Method
- Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists
(pharmacology)
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasms
(surgery)
- Pain
(drug therapy)
- Phantom Limb
(drug therapy, etiology)
- Quality of Life
- Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate
(drug effects, physiology)
|