HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

The hospital- and field-based performances of the OptiMAL test, for malaria diagnosis and treatment monitoring in central India.

Abstract
The performance of the OptiMAL test, to detect and differentiate Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax, was evaluated in central India. The subjects were either symptomatic patients, who presented at a referral hospital in urban Jabalpur, or the inhabitants of remote, tribal, forested villages where malaria is a major public-health problem. In each setting, the results of conventional microscopy were used as the 'gold standard'. Under hospital conditions, the test had excellent sensitivity (100%), good specificity (97%), a high positive predictive value (98%) and a high negative predictive value (100%). The corresponding values in the field-based study in the tribal villages (100%, 67%, 84% and 100%, respectively) were almost as good. The results of OptiMAL testing reveal the decline in parasitaemias (of P. falciparum or P. vivax) after drug administration. For monitoring the effectiveness of treatment, the test could therefore be a useful alternative to microscopy, particularly (1) in places where the facilities for microscopy are poor or non-existent and (2) among hospitalized patients with severe, complicated malaria (in whom parasitaemia and drug response need to be followed very carefully). Follow-up (within 28 days of diagnosis) of the 58 malaria cases detected in the field revealed that the OptiMAL test can be used to detect re-infection with a different Plasmodium sp. (sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 100%; J-index = 1) or recrudescence/re-infection with the same Plasmodium sp. (sensitivity = 83%; specificity = 100%; J-index = 0.83) accurately. The ability to use the test to distinguish P. falciparum from P. vivax, and to identify mixed infections of these two species, is of great significance in areas where the preferred and effective therapy for P. falciparum malaria differs from that for P. vivax.
AuthorsN Singh, N Valecha, A C Nagpal, S S Mishra, H S Varma, S K Subbarao
JournalAnnals of tropical medicine and parasitology (Ann Trop Med Parasitol) Vol. 97 Issue 1 Pg. 5-13 (Jan 2003) ISSN: 0003-4983 [Print] England
PMID12662417 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Antimalarials
  • Drug Combinations
  • fanasil, pyrimethamine drug combination
  • Sulfadoxine
  • Chloroquine
  • Pyrimethamine
Topics
  • Adult
  • Animals
  • Antimalarials (therapeutic use)
  • Chloroquine (therapeutic use)
  • Drug Combinations
  • False Negative Reactions
  • False Positive Reactions
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunologic Tests (standards)
  • Malaria, Falciparum (diagnosis, drug therapy)
  • Malaria, Vivax (diagnosis, drug therapy)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Plasmodium falciparum (isolation & purification)
  • Plasmodium vivax (isolation & purification)
  • Pyrimethamine (therapeutic use)
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Sulfadoxine (therapeutic use)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: