Abstract | OBJECTIVE: DESIGN: Prospective, placebo-controlled study, open label for goserelin therapy and double-blind for HRT. SETTING: Forty-two teaching or community hospitals. PATIENT(S): RESULT(S): Statistically significant mean decreases from baseline in the total pelvic symptom score and total subjective score were observed by week 24 for all three groups. There were no statistically significant treatment differences for change in total symptom score. Some degree of BMD loss occurred in the three groups; however, the percentage loss was consistently greater in the HRT0 group than in the HRT1 or HRT2 groups. When analyzed separately, no overall age effect on BMD change was seen in women >30 years of age versus women < or = 30 years. The HRT1 and HRT2 groups had fewer occurrences of hot flushes and vaginal dryness than did the HRT0 group. CONCLUSION(S):
Goserelin plus HRT is as effective as goserelin alone in relieving pelvic symptoms of endometriosis and attenuates both the loss of BMD and the physiologic side effects of hot flushes and vaginal dryness associated with goserelin therapy.
|
Authors | K S Moghissi, W D Schlaff, D L Olive, M A Skinner, H Yin |
Journal | Fertility and sterility
(Fertil Steril)
Vol. 69
Issue 6
Pg. 1056-62
(Jun 1998)
ISSN: 0015-0282 [Print] United States |
PMID | 9627292
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Bone Density
(drug effects)
- Double-Blind Method
- Endometriosis
(physiopathology, therapy)
- Estrogen Replacement Therapy
- Female
- Goserelin
(adverse effects, therapeutic use)
- Humans
- Menstrual Cycle
(physiology)
- Middle Aged
- Pelvis
(physiopathology)
- Prospective Studies
|